From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE fixes
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:21:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020906071121k34d6d555i6332d49b0db0fac6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906071955.42378.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Hi Bartlomiej,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 07 June 2009 18:54:08 Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> Hi Bartlomiej,
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Honestly, this should be solved on technical basis by somebody posting
>> > needed libata patches instead of attempts to slow down IDE fixes.
>>
>> Nobody is "slowing down" IDE fixes here. Linus explicitly said that
>> -rc8 is the last release candidate and the next one is going to be
>> -final. There's absolutely _no way_ this series is appropriate at the
>> very end of a release cycle.
>
> My honest opinion is that it is as appropriate now as it will be 2.6.31.
>
> [ I'm still amazed by the amount of *completely* bogus reasons given for
> not merging it. ]
I don't consider this a bogus reason at all:
10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Just search the LKML archives for the amount of crap other subsystem
maintainers have gotten from Linus when they've tried to sneak
something like that after -rc4 or so.
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-07 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-07 12:44 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 15:03 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:11 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 14:57 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:18 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 15:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 17:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 19:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 20:39 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 21:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 17:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 18:21 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-06-07 19:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 0:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 15:17 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:16 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-16 19:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 18:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 19:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-22 19:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:55 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 21:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-04-22 22:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 16:09 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-13 20:49 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 15:30 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 16:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-25 19:54 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-02 19:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-05 16:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-27 17:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-10 20:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-02 18:24 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-18 20:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-08 17:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020906071121k34d6d555i6332d49b0db0fac6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®