From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Update overloaded mask in presence of pushable task
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:50:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dae733a-689c-4574-a4dc-f59f11fb0893@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409111539.23791-4-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
On 4/9/25 16:45, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
Hi Prateek. Feel free to cc me in the future versions.
This seems interesting way if it can get us rid of newidle balance overheads.
> In presence of pushable tasks on the CPU, set it on the newly introduced
> "overloaded+mask" in sched_domain_shared struct. This will be used by
> the newidle balance to limit the scanning to these overloaded CPUs since
> they contain tasks that could be run on the newly idle target.
>
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 98d3ed2078cd..834fcdd15cac 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8559,6 +8559,24 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> return target;
> }
>
> +static inline void update_overloaded_mask(int cpu, bool contains_pushable)
> +{
> + struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> + cpumask_var_t overloaded_mask;
> +
> + if (!sd_share)
> + return;
> +
> + overloaded_mask = sd_share->overloaded_mask;
> + if (!overloaded_mask)
> + return;
> +
> + if (contains_pushable)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, overloaded_mask);
> + else
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, overloaded_mask);
> +}
> +
I was getting below error when compiling. Noticed that overloaded_mask is a local update and it wouldn't
update the actual overloaded_mask.
Compilation Error:
kernel/sched/fair.c: In function ‘update_overloaded_mask’:
kernel/sched/fair.c:8570:25: error: assignment to expression with array type
8570 | overloaded_mask = sd_share->overloaded_mask;
| ^
kernel/sched/fair.c:8571:13: warning: the address of ‘overloaded_mask’ will always evaluate as ‘true’ [-Waddress]
8571 | if (!overloaded_mask)
Made the below change. Also you would need rcu protection for sd_share i think.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index bca3db5d0ac0..818d4769ec55 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8562,19 +8562,18 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
static inline void update_overloaded_mask(int cpu, bool contains_pushable)
{
struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
- cpumask_var_t overloaded_mask;
if (!sd_share)
return;
- overloaded_mask = sd_share->overloaded_mask;
- if (!overloaded_mask)
+ if (!sd_share->overloaded_mask)
return;
+ guard(rcu)();
if (contains_pushable)
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, overloaded_mask);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, sd_share->overloaded_mask);
else
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, overloaded_mask);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, sd_share->overloaded_mask);
}
> static inline bool fair_push_task(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
> @@ -8606,11 +8624,17 @@ static inline void fair_queue_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
> static void fair_remove_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->cfs.pushable_tasks);
> +
> + if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq))
> + update_overloaded_mask(rq->cpu, false);
> }
>
> static void fair_add_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> if (fair_push_task(p)) {
> + if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq))
> + update_overloaded_mask(rq->cpu, true);
> +
> plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->cfs.pushable_tasks);
> plist_node_init(&p->pushable_tasks, p->prio);
> plist_add(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->cfs.pushable_tasks);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-21 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 11:15 [RFC PATCH 0/5] K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:25 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Introduce overloaded_mask in sched_domain_shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:26 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Update overloaded mask in presence of pushable task K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-14 2:28 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 3:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21 5:20 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-04-21 5:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21 8:03 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21 8:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: Idle and newidle balancing " K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2dae733a-689c-4574-a4dc-f59f11fb0893@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®