From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Introduce overloaded_mask in sched_domain_shared
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 20:56:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b684302-8685-4840-b523-84f0525a8420@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410100309.GB30687@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hello Peter,
On 4/10/2025 3:33 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:15:36AM +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>> Introduce a new cpumask member "overloaded_mask" in sched_domain_shared.
>> This mask will be used to keep track of overloaded CPUs with pushable
>> tasks on them and will be later used by newidle balance to only scan
>> through the overloaded CPUs to pull a task to it.
>
> 'to pull a task from it.' ?
Right! Sorry about that.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 11:15 [RFC PATCH 0/5] K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:25 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Introduce overloaded_mask in sched_domain_shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:26 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Update overloaded mask in presence of pushable task K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-14 2:28 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 3:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21 5:20 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21 5:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21 8:03 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21 8:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: Idle and newidle balancing " K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b684302-8685-4840-b523-84f0525a8420@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®