mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer
@ 2026-06-03 14:13 Doruk Tan Ozturk
  2026-06-03 14:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
  2026-06-06 12:10 ` David Heidelberg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Doruk Tan Ozturk @ 2026-06-03 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Heidelberg, oe-linux-nfc
  Cc: Aleksander Lobakin, netdev, linux-kernel, Doruk Tan Ozturk, stable

digital_in_recv_sensf_res() memcpy()s resp->len bytes from a remote
NFC-F device response into the NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE-byte target.sensf_res
field without an upper-bound check. A nearby malicious NFC-F device can
send an oversized SENSF_RES response to overflow the stack-local struct
nfc_target.

Clamp resp->len to NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE before the copy.

Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).

Fixes: 8c0695e4998d ("NFC Digital: Add NFC-F technology support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
---
v2:
 - Clamp resp->len with min_t() before the copy (Alexander Lobakin).
 - Add Fixes: tag and Cc: stable (Alexander Lobakin).
 - Frame as a stack buffer overflow (saved-return overwrite not demonstrated).
 net/nfc/digital_technology.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_technology.c b/net/nfc/digital_technology.c
index ae63c5eb0..ae6487c10 100644
--- a/net/nfc/digital_technology.c
+++ b/net/nfc/digital_technology.c
@@ -778,6 +778,8 @@ static void digital_in_recv_sensf_res(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, void *arg,
 
 	sensf_res = (struct digital_sensf_res *)resp->data;
 
+	resp->len = min_t(unsigned int, resp->len, NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE);
+
 	memcpy(target.sensf_res, sensf_res, resp->len);
 	target.sensf_res_len = resp->len;
 
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer
  2026-06-03 14:13 [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer Doruk Tan Ozturk
@ 2026-06-03 14:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
  2026-06-03 16:46   ` Doruk (0sec)
  2026-06-06 12:10 ` David Heidelberg
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Lobakin @ 2026-06-03 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doruk Tan Ozturk
  Cc: David Heidelberg, oe-linux-nfc, netdev, linux-kernel, stable

From: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
Date: Wed,  3 Jun 2026 16:13:55 +0200

> digital_in_recv_sensf_res() memcpy()s resp->len bytes from a remote
> NFC-F device response into the NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE-byte target.sensf_res
> field without an upper-bound check. A nearby malicious NFC-F device can
> send an oversized SENSF_RES response to overflow the stack-local struct
> nfc_target.
> 
> Clamp resp->len to NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE before the copy.
> 
> Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).
> 
> Fixes: 8c0695e4998d ("NFC Digital: Add NFC-F technology support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>

Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

> ---
> v2:
>  - Clamp resp->len with min_t() before the copy (Alexander Lobakin).
>  - Add Fixes: tag and Cc: stable (Alexander Lobakin).
>  - Frame as a stack buffer overflow (saved-return overwrite not demonstrated).
>  net/nfc/digital_technology.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_technology.c b/net/nfc/digital_technology.c
> index ae63c5eb0..ae6487c10 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/digital_technology.c
> +++ b/net/nfc/digital_technology.c
> @@ -778,6 +778,8 @@ static void digital_in_recv_sensf_res(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, void *arg,
>  
>  	sensf_res = (struct digital_sensf_res *)resp->data;
>  
> +	resp->len = min_t(unsigned int, resp->len, NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE);
> +
>  	memcpy(target.sensf_res, sensf_res, resp->len);
>  	target.sensf_res_len = resp->len;

I was wondering whether we need to record this in the kernel log.

But given that a malicious device can and would be happy to flood with
such packets, it would be pr_warn_once() or something similar at max.

But I guess it's not needed at all, we can just silently clamp such packets?

Thanks,
Olek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer
  2026-06-03 14:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
@ 2026-06-03 16:46   ` Doruk (0sec)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Doruk (0sec) @ 2026-06-03 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aleksander.lobakin; +Cc: david, oe-linux-nfc, netdev, linux-kernel, stable

On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 04:28 PM, Alexander Lobakin
<aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
> But I guess it's not needed at all, we can just silently clamp such packets?

I agree, thanks for the review!
Doruk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer
  2026-06-03 14:13 [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer Doruk Tan Ozturk
  2026-06-03 14:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
@ 2026-06-06 12:10 ` David Heidelberg
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Heidelberg @ 2026-06-06 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doruk Tan Ozturk
  Cc: Aleksander Lobakin, netdev, linux-kernel, stable, oe-linux-nfc


On Wed, 03 Jun 2026 16:13:55 +0200, Doruk Tan Ozturk wrote:
 > nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer
       commit: b3d780a22685ea355e18bfeac79d15252236d70e

Best regards,
-- 
David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-06 12:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-03 14:13 [PATCH net v2] nfc: digital: clamp SENSF_RES length to the destination buffer Doruk Tan Ozturk
2026-06-03 14:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
2026-06-03 16:46   ` Doruk (0sec)
2026-06-06 12:10 ` David Heidelberg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®