From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/18] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 09:44:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f42037f-b7b8-4ced-a945-d1d12eb70249@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921004834.2601285-11-skhawaja@google.com>
On 9/21/26 08:48, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> During boot fetch the preserved state of IOMMU unit and if found then
> restore the state.
>
> - Reuse the root_table that was preserved in the previous kernel.
> - Reclaim the domain ids of the preserved domains for each preserved
> devices so these are not acquired by another domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 7 ++
> drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 474c926172c5..c5044e834337 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -987,28 +987,30 @@ static void iommu_disable_translation(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->register_lock, flag);
> }
>
> -static void disable_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> +static void release_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
Can we put the code refactor in a separate patch? Mixing it with a
feature patch makes it hard for review.
> {
> - /*
> - * All iommu domains must have been detached from the devices,
> - * hence there should be no domain IDs in use.
> - */
> - if (WARN_ON(!ida_is_empty(&iommu->domain_ida)))
> - return;
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser;
>
> - if (iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE)
> - iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
> -}
> + iommu_ser = iommu_get_preserved_data(iommu->reg_phys, IOMMU_INTEL);
> + if (!iommu_ser) {
> + /*
> + * All iommu domains must have been detached from the devices,
> + * hence there should be no domain IDs in use.
> + */
> + WARN_ON(!ida_is_empty(&iommu->domain_ida));
> +
> + if ((iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE))
> + iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
> + }
>
> -static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> -{
> if (iommu->copied_tables) {
> bitmap_free(iommu->copied_tables);
> iommu->copied_tables = NULL;
> }
>
> - /* free context mapping */
> - free_context_table(iommu);
> + /* free context mapping if there is no serialized state. */
> + if (!iommu_ser)
> + free_context_table(iommu);
>
> if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap))
> intel_iommu_finish_prq(iommu);
> @@ -1632,12 +1634,19 @@ static int copy_translation_tables(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>
> static int __init init_dmars(void)
> {
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser;
> struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> int ret;
>
> for_each_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> + iommu_ser = iommu_get_preserved_data(iommu->reg_phys, IOMMU_INTEL);
> if (drhd->ignored) {
> + if (WARN_ON(iommu_ser)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_iommu;
> + }
> +
> iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
> continue;
> }
> @@ -1655,7 +1664,9 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
> }
>
> intel_iommu_init_qi(iommu);
> - init_translation_status(iommu);
> +
> + if (!iommu_ser)
> + init_translation_status(iommu);
>
> if (translation_pre_enabled(iommu) && !is_kdump_kernel()) {
> iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
> @@ -1664,14 +1675,18 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
> iommu->name);
> }
>
> - /*
> - * TBD:
> - * we could share the same root & context tables
> - * among all IOMMU's. Need to Split it later.
> - */
> - ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu);
> - if (ret)
> - goto free_iommu;
> + if (iommu_ser) {
> + intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(iommu, iommu_ser);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * TBD:
> + * we could share the same root & context tables
> + * among all IOMMU's. Need to Split it later.
> + */
> + ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_iommu;
> + }
>
> if (translation_pre_enabled(iommu)) {
> pr_info("Translation already enabled - trying to copy translation structures\n");
> @@ -1707,7 +1722,10 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
> */
> for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> iommu_flush_write_buffer(iommu);
> - iommu_set_root_entry(iommu);
> +
> + iommu_ser = iommu_get_preserved_data(iommu->reg_phys, IOMMU_INTEL);
> + if (!iommu_ser)
> + iommu_set_root_entry(iommu);
> }
>
> check_tylersburg_isoch();
> @@ -1752,10 +1770,8 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
> return 0;
>
> free_iommu:
> - for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> - disable_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> - free_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> - }
> + for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd)
> + release_dmar_iommu(iommu);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2136,17 +2152,28 @@ int dmar_parse_one_satc(struct acpi_dmar_header *hdr, void *arg)
> static int intel_iommu_add(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru)
> {
> struct intel_iommu *iommu = dmaru->iommu;
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser;
> int ret;
>
> + /* Use IOMMU HW unit MMIO base to identify the preserved state. */
> + iommu_ser = iommu_get_preserved_data(iommu->reg_phys, IOMMU_INTEL);
> +
> /*
> * Disable translation if already enabled prior to OS handover.
> */
> - if (iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE)
> + if (!iommu_ser && iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE)
> iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
>
> - ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> + if (iommu_ser) {
> + if (WARN_ON(dmaru->ignored))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(iommu, iommu_ser);
> + } else {
> + ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> intel_svm_check(iommu);
>
> @@ -2165,23 +2192,23 @@ static int intel_iommu_add(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru)
> if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap)) {
> ret = intel_iommu_enable_prq(iommu);
> if (ret)
> - goto disable_iommu;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> ret = dmar_set_interrupt(iommu);
> if (ret)
> - goto disable_iommu;
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!iommu_ser)
> + iommu_set_root_entry(iommu);
>
> - iommu_set_root_entry(iommu);
> iommu_enable_translation(iommu);
>
> iommu_disable_protect_mem_regions(iommu);
> return 0;
>
> -disable_iommu:
> - disable_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> out:
> - free_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> + release_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2195,12 +2222,10 @@ int dmar_iommu_hotplug(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru, bool insert)
> if (iommu == NULL)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (insert) {
> + if (insert)
> ret = intel_iommu_add(dmaru);
> - } else {
> - disable_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> - free_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> - }
> + else
> + release_dmar_iommu(iommu);
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> index 4feb5bd76b18..3a2cb08c0ac1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> @@ -1308,10 +1308,17 @@ int intel_iommu_preserve(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> void intel_iommu_unpreserve(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser);
> void clear_unpreserved_context_entries(struct intel_iommu *iommu);
> +void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser);
> #else
> static inline void clear_unpreserved_context_entries(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser)
> +{
> +}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
> index 501dc0e9cc0a..c9e553379683 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
> @@ -272,6 +272,85 @@ static int preserve_iommu_context_tables(struct device_domain_info *info)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void restore_iommu_context(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct context_entry *context;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ROOT_ENTRY_NR; i++) {
> + context = iommu_context_addr(iommu, i, 0, 0);
> + if (context)
> + iommu_restore_pages(virt_to_phys(context));
Why not use the serialized context_tables_bitmap as the source of truth,
and check it against the present bits?
> +
> + if (!sm_supported(iommu))
> + continue;
> +
> + context = iommu_context_addr(iommu, i, 0x80, 0);
> + if (context)
> + iommu_restore_pages(virt_to_phys(context));
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int _restore_used_domain_ids(struct iommu_device_ser *ser, void *arg)
> +{
> + int id = ser->domain_iommu_ser.attachment_id;
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_hw_ser;
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = arg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys))
> + return 0;
> +
> + iommu_hw_ser = phys_to_virt(ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys);
> + if (iommu_hw_ser->type != IOMMU_INTEL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Only allocate domain ID from associated IOMMU HW unit */
> + if (iommu_hw_ser->intel.phys_addr != iommu->reg_phys)
> + return 0;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&iommu->did_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * The domain IDs are reclaimed while the IOMMU HW unit is being
> + * restored and not registered with the IOMMU core. So if the ID already
> + * exists, it is safe to assume that a preserved device sharing the same
> + * domain ID reclaimed it.
> + */
> + if (ida_exists(&iommu->domain_ida, id))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu->domain_ida, id, id, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
Commit 12a2ea2d91be ("iommu/vt-d: Handle DID reservation errors when
copying context tables") on the iommu/next branch introduced a new
helper named reserve_domain_id() for reserving a domain ID inherited
from the previous kernel. Could it be reused here?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table() - Restore root table and reclaim domain IDs
> + * @iommu: Target IOMMU
> + * @iommu_ser: Serialized IOMMU hardware state from previous kernel
> + *
> + * Restores the preserved root table and context tables for the IOMMU hardware
> + * instance across Live Update, and reclaims all domain IDs previously allocated
> + * to preserved devices so they are not reused.
> + */
> +void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser)
> +{
This restores the preserved root table without checking the new
environment. Is it possible that kexec has a different kernel command
line (say intel_iommu=sm_off) for the new kernel than the previous
kernel? sm_supported(iommu) will then return a value different from the
real hardware configuration.
> + if (!iommu_ser->intel.restored)
> + iommu_restore_pages(iommu_ser->intel.root_table);
> +
> + iommu->root_entry = __va(iommu_ser->intel.root_table);
Why does the above line execute no matter the value of
iommu_ser->intel.restored? It would be more readable if the code looked
like...
if (iommu_ser->intel.restored)
return;
iommu_restore_pages(iommu_ser->intel.root_table);
... ...
Or I overlooked anything?
> +
> + if (!iommu_ser->intel.restored)
> + restore_iommu_context(iommu);
> +
> + iommu_ser->intel.restored = 1;
> + BUG_ON(iommu_for_each_preserved_device(_restore_used_domain_ids, iommu));
> +}
> +
> /**
> * intel_iommu_preserve_device() - Intel IOMMU callback to preserve device state
> * @dev: Target device
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 0:48 [PATCH v5 00/18] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] memfd: export memfd_get_seals() Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU Live update FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-06 23:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU domain preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 3:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-08 7:54 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] iommu/vt-d: Clear unpreserved context entries during shutdown Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 0:43 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] iommu: Add APIs to get iommu and device preserved state Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 1:44 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 19:44 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] iommu/vt-d: Handle reattach of the restored domain Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 2:24 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] iommu/vt-d: Preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 3:38 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] iommufd: Implement ioctl to mark HWPT for preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 20:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-23 23:59 ` John Starks
2026-09-24 17:49 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 21:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 22:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f42037f-b7b8-4ced-a945-d1d12eb70249@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®