From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] iommu/vt-d: Handle reattach of the restored domain
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 10:24:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5be26af3-9d0c-40ce-bf58-9e98ef4a8670@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921004834.2601285-13-skhawaja@google.com>
On 9/21/26 08:48, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> Reattach the restored domain to the preserved device using restored
> domain ID. While reattaching do not setup the context and PASID entries
> as those are preserved during liveupdate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 32 +++++--
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 14 +++
> drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index c5044e834337..6d3cbe0745c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2819,6 +2819,9 @@ static int blocking_domain_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> {
> struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>
> + if (dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> iopf_for_domain_remove(info->domain ? &info->domain->domain : NULL, dev);
> device_block_translation(dev);
> return 0;
> @@ -3187,6 +3190,9 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> {
> int ret;
>
> + if (dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
> + return intel_iommu_restore_device(domain, dev);
> +
> device_block_translation(dev);
>
> ret = paging_domain_compatible(domain, dev);
> @@ -3317,7 +3323,8 @@ static struct iommu_device *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> info->iommu = iommu;
> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&info->node);
> if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> - if (ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
> + if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev) &&
> + ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
> pci_ats_supported(pdev) &&
> dmar_ats_supported(pdev, iommu)) {
> info->ats_supported = 1;
> @@ -3421,12 +3428,16 @@ static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
> struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>
> - iommu_disable_pci_pri(info);
> - iommu_disable_pci_ats(info);
> + if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev)) {
> + iommu_disable_pci_pri(info);
> + iommu_disable_pci_ats(info);
>
> - if (info->pasid_enabled) {
> - pci_disable_pasid(to_pci_dev(dev));
> - info->pasid_enabled = 0;
> + if (info->pasid_enabled) {
> + pci_disable_pasid(to_pci_dev(dev));
> + info->pasid_enabled = 0;
> + }
> + } else {
> + intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(dev);
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
> @@ -3434,11 +3445,13 @@ static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
> device_rbtree_remove(info);
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
>
> - if (sm_supported(iommu) && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev) &&
> + if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev) && sm_supported(iommu) &&
> + !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev) &&
> !context_copied(iommu, info->bus, info->devfn))
> intel_pasid_teardown_sm_context(dev);
>
> - intel_pasid_free_table(dev);
> + if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
> + intel_pasid_free_table(dev);
> intel_iommu_debugfs_remove_dev(info);
> kfree(info);
> }
> @@ -3900,6 +3913,9 @@ static int identity_domain_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
> int ret;
>
> + if (dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> device_block_translation(dev);
>
> if (dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev))
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> index 3a2cb08c0ac1..25104644317c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> @@ -1310,6 +1310,9 @@ void intel_iommu_unpreserve(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> void clear_unpreserved_context_entries(struct intel_iommu *iommu);
> void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser);
> +int intel_iommu_restore_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev);
> +int intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(struct device *dev);
> #else
> static inline void clear_unpreserved_context_entries(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> {
> @@ -1319,6 +1322,17 @@ static inline void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu
> struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline int intel_iommu_restore_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
> index c9e553379683..6e6707eefc8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
> @@ -351,6 +351,165 @@ void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> BUG_ON(iommu_for_each_preserved_device(_restore_used_domain_ids, iommu));
> }
>
> +static void domain_detach_reattached_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu)
The naming is ambiguous. How about
domain_detach_restored_iommu()
domain_attach_restored_iommu()
?
> +{
> + struct iommu_domain_info *info;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&iommu->did_lock);
> + info = xa_load(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
> + if (--info->refcnt == 0) {
> + xa_erase(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
> + kfree(info);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int domain_reattach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> + struct iommu_device_ser *device_ser)
> +{
> + struct iommu_domain_info *info, *curr;
> + struct iommu_domain_ser *domain_ser;
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_hw_ser;
> + int restored_did;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!iommu_domain_restored_state(&domain->domain))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.domain_phys ||
> + !device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + domain_ser = phys_to_virt(device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.domain_phys);
> + if (domain_ser->restored_domain != &domain->domain)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + iommu_hw_ser = phys_to_virt(device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys);
> + if (iommu_hw_ser->type != IOMMU_INTEL ||
> + iommu_hw_ser->intel.phys_addr != iommu->reg_phys)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + restored_did = device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.attachment_id;
> + if (!ida_exists(&iommu->domain_ida, restored_did))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + info = kzalloc_obj(*info);
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&iommu->did_lock);
> + curr = xa_load(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
> + if (curr) {
> + curr->refcnt++;
> + kfree(info);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + info->refcnt = 1;
> + info->did = restored_did;
> + info->iommu = iommu;
> + curr = xa_cmpxchg(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id,
> + NULL, info, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (curr) {
> + ret = xa_err(curr) ? : -EBUSY;
> + goto err_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unlock:
> + kfree(info);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_iommu_restore_device() - Restore device domain attachment after live update
> + * @domain: Restored domain
> + * @dev: Restored device
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or negative error code.
> + */
> +int intel_iommu_restore_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev)
How about renaming it intel_iommu_attach_restored_device() to pair with
the detach helper?
> +{
> + struct iommu_device_ser *device_ser = dev_iommu_restored_state(dev);
> + struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> + struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!device_ser)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
The vmd subdevices rely on the host endpoint to restore the domain
attachment, so instead of returning an error, it could return 0,
indicating nothing to do?
> +
> + ret = domain_reattach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu, device_ser);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + info->domain = dmar_domain;
> + info->domain_attached = true;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
> + list_add(&info->link, &dmar_domain->devices);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = cache_tag_assign_domain(dmar_domain, dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
The restored domain is an immutable domain. It could only be freed; no
map and unmap should happen on it. So why do you need to assign a cache
tag for it?
> +
> + ret = iopf_for_domain_set(domain, dev);
ATS and PRI are not supported on the preserved devices, so the above is
dead code, right?
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + /*
> + * Detach the restored domain from device and iommu on failure, but keep
> + * the hardware state intact.
> + */
> + info->domain_attached = false;
> + cache_tag_unassign_domain(info->domain, dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&info->domain->lock, flags);
> + list_del(&info->link);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->domain->lock, flags);
> +
> + domain_detach_reattached_iommu(info->domain, iommu);
> + info->domain = NULL;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (!info->domain_attached || !info->domain)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + domain = &info->domain->domain;
> + if (!iommu_domain_restored_state(domain))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + iopf_for_domain_remove(domain, dev);
> + cache_tag_unassign_domain(info->domain, dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
> + info->domain_attached = false;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&info->domain->lock, flags);
> + list_del(&info->link);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->domain->lock, flags);
> +
> + domain_detach_reattached_iommu(info->domain, iommu);
> + info->domain = NULL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * intel_iommu_preserve_device() - Intel IOMMU callback to preserve device state
> * @dev: Target device
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 0:48 [PATCH v5 00/18] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] memfd: export memfd_get_seals() Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU Live update FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-06 23:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU domain preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 3:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-08 7:54 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] iommu/vt-d: Clear unpreserved context entries during shutdown Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 0:43 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] iommu: Add APIs to get iommu and device preserved state Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 1:44 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 19:44 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] iommu/vt-d: Handle reattach of the restored domain Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 2:24 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] iommu/vt-d: Preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 3:38 ` Baolu Lu
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] iommufd: Implement ioctl to mark HWPT for preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 20:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-23 23:59 ` John Starks
2026-09-24 17:49 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 21:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 22:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5be26af3-9d0c-40ce-bf58-9e98ef4a8670@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®