From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
xiongwei.song@windriver.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
sandipan.das@amd.com, kai.huang@intel.com, seanjc@google.com,
xin3.li@intel.com, ebiggers@google.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, james.morse@arm.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, peternewman@google.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify io_alloc Capacity Bit Masks
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 15:19:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f83026e-6ea5-4a50-9029-841e07934aac@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <906f3a02-3acc-47c0-9bdb-8a9135160c4a@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 3/21/25 18:00, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 1/30/25 1:20 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> "io_alloc" feature is a mechanism that enables direct insertion of data
>> from I/O devices into the L3 cache. By directly caching data from I/O
>> devices rather than first storing the I/O data in DRAM, it reduces the
>> demands on DRAM bandwidth and reduces latency to the processor consuming
>> the I/O data.
>>
>> io_alloc feature uses the highest CLOSID to route the traffic from I/O
>> devices. Provide the interface to modify io_alloc CBMs (Capacity Bit Mask)
>> when feature is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v3: Minor changes due to changes in resctrl_arch_get_io_alloc_enabled()
>> and resctrl_io_alloc_closid_get().
>> Taken care of handling the CBM update when CDP is enabled.
>> Updated the commit log to make it generic.
>>
>> v2: Added more generic text in documentation.
>> ---
>> Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst | 12 ++
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> index 1b67e31d626c..29c8851bcc7f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> @@ -169,6 +169,18 @@ related to allocation:
>> When CDP is enabled, io_alloc routes I/O traffic using the highest
>> CLOSID allocated for the instruction cache.
>>
>> +"io_alloc_cbm":
>> + Capacity Bit Masks (CBMs) available to supported IO devices which
>> + can directly insert cache lines in L3 which can help to reduce the
>> + latency. CBM can be configured by writing to the interface in the
>> + following format::
>> +
>> + L3:<cache_id0>=<cbm>;<cache_id1>=<cbm>;...
>
> This format is dependent on the resource name (not always L3).
Yes. Will remove "L3:"
>
>> +
>> + When CDP is enabled, L3 control is divided into two separate resources:
>> + L3CODE and L3DATA. However, the CBM can only be updated on the L3CODE
>> + resource.
>> +
>> Memory bandwidth(MB) subdirectory contains the following files
>> with respect to allocation:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>> index d272dea43924..4dfee0436c1c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ int parse_bw(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct resctrl_schema *s,
>> * requires at least two bits set.
>> * AMD allows non-contiguous bitmasks.
>> */
>> -static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
>> +bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
>> {
>> unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit, val;
>> unsigned int cbm_len = r->cache.cbm_len;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> index 07cf8409174d..702f6926bbdf 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> @@ -669,4 +669,5 @@ void rdt_staged_configs_clear(void);
>> bool closid_allocated(unsigned int closid);
>> int resctrl_find_cleanest_closid(void);
>> void show_doms(struct seq_file *s, struct resctrl_schema *schema, int closid);
>> +bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r);
>> #endif /* _ASM_X86_RESCTRL_INTERNAL_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index 81b9d8c5dabf..9997cbfc1c19 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -1999,6 +1999,137 @@ static int resctrl_io_alloc_cbm_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Read the CBM and check the validity. Make sure CBM is not shared
>> + * with any other exclusive resctrl groups.
>> + */
>> +static int resctrl_io_alloc_parse_cbm(char *buf, struct resctrl_schema *s,
>> + struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d)
>> +{
>> + struct resctrl_staged_config *cfg;
>> + struct rdt_resource *r = s->res;
>> + u32 io_alloc_closid;
>> + u32 cbm_val;
>> +
>> + cfg = &d->staged_config[s->conf_type];
>> + if (cfg->have_new_ctrl) {
>> + rdt_last_cmd_printf("Duplicate domain %d\n", d->hdr.id);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!cbm_validate(buf, &cbm_val, r))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The CBM may not overlap with other exclusive group.
>> + */
>> + io_alloc_closid = resctrl_io_alloc_closid_get(r, s);
>> + if (rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps(s, d, cbm_val, io_alloc_closid, true)) {
>> + rdt_last_cmd_puts("Overlaps with exclusive group\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cfg->new_ctrl = cbm_val;
>> + cfg->have_new_ctrl = true;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Could you please reduce amount of duplication with parse_cbm()?
parse_cbm() needs rdtgrp to read 'mode' and 'closid' which is passed in
rdt_parse_data.
We can call parse_cbm directly if we add 'mode' and closid in
rdt_parse_data. Will add those changes in next revision.
>
> (for rest of patch, please check that related comments from previous patches
> are addressed here also)
Sure. Will do.
>
> Reinette
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-30 21:20 [PATCH v3 0/7] Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/resctrl: Add SDCIAE feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/resctrl: Detect io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:13 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/resctrl: Implement "io_alloc" enable/disable handlers Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:14 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:17 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display io_alloc CBMs Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:18 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify io_alloc Capacity Bit Masks Babu Moger
2025-03-21 23:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:19 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2025-03-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:12 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-08 21:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-09 0:41 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-09 1:41 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-10 0:58 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-10 3:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-10 22:29 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f83026e-6ea5-4a50-9029-841e07934aac@amd.com \
--to=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
--cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®