mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<paulmck@kernel.org>, <thuth@redhat.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<xiongwei.song@windriver.com>,
	<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>, <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	<daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	<perry.yuan@amd.com>, <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
	<kai.huang@intel.com>, <seanjc@google.com>, <xin3.li@intel.com>,
	<ebiggers@google.com>, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	<mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	<james.morse@arm.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	<peternewman@google.com>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <eranian@google.com>,
	<corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify io_alloc Capacity Bit Masks
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:00:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <906f3a02-3acc-47c0-9bdb-8a9135160c4a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74b65f562c4d61d24cb2be53fb05ee1ca436d59e.1738272037.git.babu.moger@amd.com>

Hi Babu,

On 1/30/25 1:20 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> "io_alloc" feature is a mechanism that enables direct insertion of data
> from I/O devices into the L3 cache. By directly caching data from I/O
> devices rather than first storing the I/O data in DRAM, it reduces the
> demands on DRAM bandwidth and reduces latency to the processor consuming
> the I/O data.
> 
> io_alloc feature uses the highest CLOSID to route the traffic from I/O
> devices. Provide the interface to modify io_alloc CBMs (Capacity Bit Mask)
> when feature is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
> v3: Minor changes due to changes in resctrl_arch_get_io_alloc_enabled()
>     and resctrl_io_alloc_closid_get().
>     Taken care of handling the CBM update when CDP is enabled.
>     Updated the commit log to make it generic.
> 
> v2: Added more generic text in documentation.
> ---
>  Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst        |  12 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c    | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> index 1b67e31d626c..29c8851bcc7f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> @@ -169,6 +169,18 @@ related to allocation:
>  		When CDP is enabled, io_alloc routes I/O traffic using the highest
>  		CLOSID allocated for the instruction cache.
>  
> +"io_alloc_cbm":
> +		Capacity Bit Masks (CBMs) available to supported IO devices which
> +		can directly insert cache lines in L3 which can help to reduce the
> +		latency. CBM can be configured by writing to the interface in the
> +		following format::
> +
> +			L3:<cache_id0>=<cbm>;<cache_id1>=<cbm>;...

This format is dependent on the resource name (not always L3).

> +
> +		When CDP is enabled, L3 control is divided into two separate resources:
> +		L3CODE and L3DATA. However, the CBM can only be updated on the L3CODE
> +		resource.
> +
>  Memory bandwidth(MB) subdirectory contains the following files
>  with respect to allocation:
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> index d272dea43924..4dfee0436c1c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ int parse_bw(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct resctrl_schema *s,
>   * requires at least two bits set.
>   * AMD allows non-contiguous bitmasks.
>   */
> -static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
> +bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  {
>  	unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit, val;
>  	unsigned int cbm_len = r->cache.cbm_len;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 07cf8409174d..702f6926bbdf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -669,4 +669,5 @@ void rdt_staged_configs_clear(void);
>  bool closid_allocated(unsigned int closid);
>  int resctrl_find_cleanest_closid(void);
>  void show_doms(struct seq_file *s, struct resctrl_schema *schema, int closid);
> +bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r);
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_RESCTRL_INTERNAL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 81b9d8c5dabf..9997cbfc1c19 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1999,6 +1999,137 @@ static int resctrl_io_alloc_cbm_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Read the CBM and check the validity. Make sure CBM is not shared
> + * with any other exclusive resctrl groups.
> + */
> +static int resctrl_io_alloc_parse_cbm(char *buf, struct resctrl_schema *s,
> +				      struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d)
> +{
> +	struct resctrl_staged_config *cfg;
> +	struct rdt_resource *r = s->res;
> +	u32 io_alloc_closid;
> +	u32 cbm_val;
> +
> +	cfg = &d->staged_config[s->conf_type];
> +	if (cfg->have_new_ctrl) {
> +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("Duplicate domain %d\n", d->hdr.id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!cbm_validate(buf, &cbm_val, r))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The CBM may not overlap with other exclusive group.
> +	 */
> +	io_alloc_closid = resctrl_io_alloc_closid_get(r, s);
> +	if (rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps(s, d, cbm_val, io_alloc_closid, true)) {
> +		rdt_last_cmd_puts("Overlaps with exclusive group\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	cfg->new_ctrl = cbm_val;
> +	cfg->have_new_ctrl = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Could you please reduce amount of duplication with parse_cbm()?

(for rest of patch, please check that related comments from previous patches
are addressed here also)

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-30 21:20 [PATCH v3 0/7] Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/resctrl: Add SDCIAE feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/resctrl: Detect io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:13     ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/resctrl: Implement "io_alloc" enable/disable handlers Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:14     ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:17     ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display io_alloc CBMs Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:18     ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify io_alloc Capacity Bit Masks Babu Moger
2025-03-21 23:00   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-04-07 20:19     ` Moger, Babu
2025-03-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:12   ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-08 21:44     ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-09  0:41       ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-09  1:41         ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-10  0:58           ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-10  3:59             ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-10 22:29               ` Moger, Babu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=906f3a02-3acc-47c0-9bdb-8a9135160c4a@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®