From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<paulmck@kernel.org>, <thuth@redhat.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<xiongwei.song@windriver.com>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>, <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
<daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
<perry.yuan@amd.com>, <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
<kai.huang@intel.com>, <seanjc@google.com>, <xin3.li@intel.com>,
<ebiggers@google.com>, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
<mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
<james.morse@arm.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
<peternewman@google.com>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <eranian@google.com>,
<corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/resctrl: Detect io_alloc feature
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:51:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fff9df3e-34ae-4aa0-8847-130a4ffd8fcf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c07cd3fb7963320819e555086f701f125b55f4d.1738272037.git.babu.moger@amd.com>
Hi Babu,
On 1/30/25 1:20 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> "io_alloc" feature is a mechanism that enables direct insertion of data
> from I/O devices into the L3 cache. By directly caching data from I/O
> devices rather than first storing the I/O data in DRAM, feature reduces
> the demands on DRAM bandwidth and reduces latency to the processor
> consuming the I/O data.
This provides good context but the changelog does not mention what this patch
does.
An idea to get started (please improve):
Data from I/O devices can be inserted directly into L3 cache. This
reduces demands on DRAM bandwidth and reduces latency to the processor
consuming the I/O data.
Introduce cache resource property "io_alloc_capable" that an
architecture can set if a portion of the L3 cache can be allocated
for I/O traffic. Set this property on x86 systems that support SDCIAE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
> v3: Rewrote commit log. Changed the text to bit generic than the AMD specific.
> Renamed the rdt_get_sdciae_alloc_cfg() to rdt_set_io_alloc_capable().
> Removed leftover comment from v2.
>
> v2: Changed sdciae_capable to io_alloc_capable to make it generic feature.
> Also moved the io_alloc_capable in struct resctrl_cache.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index c2450cd52511..1ebdb2dcc009 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,11 @@ static void rdt_get_cdp_config(int level)
> rdt_resources_all[level].r_resctrl.cdp_capable = true;
> }
>
> +static void rdt_set_io_alloc_capable(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + r->cache.io_alloc_capable = true;
> +}
> +
> static void rdt_get_cdp_l3_config(void)
> {
> rdt_get_cdp_config(RDT_RESOURCE_L3);
> @@ -931,6 +936,8 @@ static __init bool get_rdt_alloc_resources(void)
> rdt_get_cache_alloc_cfg(1, r);
> if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CDP_L3))
> rdt_get_cdp_l3_config();
> + if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SDCIAE))
> + rdt_set_io_alloc_capable(r);
> ret = true;
> }
> if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CAT_L2)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index d94abba1c716..dbe6461f3fbc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ struct rdt_mon_domain {
> * @arch_has_sparse_bitmasks: True if a bitmask like f00f is valid.
> * @arch_has_per_cpu_cfg: True if QOS_CFG register for this cache
> * level has CPU scope.
> + * @io_alloc_capable: True if portion of the L3 cache can be allocated
> + * for I/O traffic.
Enforcing that this should be for L3 cache is confusing. On a system with
L3 and L2 cache resources each resource will be described by the properties in
struct resctrl_cache for particular resource. We do not want to set "io_alloc_capable"
to true in the L2's struct if the L3 cache supports this feature.
This can just be: "True if portion of the cache can be allocated for I/O traffic"
> */
> struct resctrl_cache {
> unsigned int cbm_len;
> @@ -136,6 +138,7 @@ struct resctrl_cache {
> unsigned int shareable_bits;
> bool arch_has_sparse_bitmasks;
> bool arch_has_per_cpu_cfg;
> + bool io_alloc_capable;
> };
>
> /**
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-30 21:20 [PATCH v3 0/7] Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/resctrl: Add SDCIAE feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/resctrl: Detect io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-04-07 20:13 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/resctrl: Implement "io_alloc" enable/disable handlers Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:14 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:17 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display io_alloc CBMs Babu Moger
2025-03-21 22:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:18 ` Moger, Babu
2025-01-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify io_alloc Capacity Bit Masks Babu Moger
2025-03-21 23:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:19 ` Moger, Babu
2025-03-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 20:12 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-08 21:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-09 0:41 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-09 1:41 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-10 0:58 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-10 3:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-10 22:29 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fff9df3e-34ae-4aa0-8847-130a4ffd8fcf@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
--cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®