From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>,
David Decotigny <ddecotig@google.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] genirq: Always limit the affinity to online CPUs
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:08:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39f69dfe-32e5-4cb3-118b-5c02b28cbcff@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877d7sar5k.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
On 14.04.2022 12:35, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:09:31 +0100,
> Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>> On 13.04.2022 19:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:59:21 +0100,
>>> Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> On 05.04.2022 20:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>> When booting with maxcpus=<small number> (or even loading a driver
>>>>> while most CPUs are offline), it is pretty easy to observe managed
>>>>> affinities containing a mix of online and offline CPUs being passed
>>>>> to the irqchip driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> This means that the irqchip cannot trust the affinity passed down
>>>>> from the core code, which is a bit annoying and requires (at least
>>>>> in theory) all drivers to implement some sort of affinity narrowing.
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to address this, always limit the cpumask to the set of
>>>>> online CPUs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>>>> This patch landed in linux next-20220413 as commit 33de0aa4bae9
>>>> ("genirq: Always limit the affinity to online CPUs"). Unfortunately it
>>>> breaks booting of most ARM 32bit Samsung Exynos based boards.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see anything specific in the log, though. Booting just hangs at
>>>> some point. The only Samsung Exynos boards that boot properly are those
>>>> Exynos4412 based.
>>>>
>>>> I assume that this is related to the Multi Core Timer IRQ configuration
>>>> specific for that SoCs. Exynos4412 uses PPI interrupts, while all other
>>>> Exynos SoCs have separate IRQ lines for each CPU.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know how I can help debugging this issue.
>>> Thanks for the heads up. Can you pick the last working kernel, enable
>>> CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS, and dump the /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/
>>> entries for the timer IRQs?
>> Exynos4210, Trats board, next-20220411:
> Thanks for all of the debug, super helpful. The issue is that we don't
> handle the 'force' case, which a handful of drivers are using when
> bringing up CPUs (and doing so before the CPUs are marked online).
>
> Can you please give the below hack a go?
This patch fixed the issue. Thanks! Feel free to add my:
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 18:50 [PATCH v3 0/3] genirq: Managed affinity fixes Marc Zyngier
2022-04-05 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] genirq/msi: Shutdown managed interrupts with unsatifiable affinities Marc Zyngier
2022-04-10 19:13 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2022-04-05 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] genirq: Always limit the affinity to online CPUs Marc Zyngier
2022-04-10 19:12 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
[not found] ` <CGME20220413145922eucas1p2dc46908354f4d2b48db79978d086a838@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-04-13 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] " Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-13 17:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-14 9:09 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-14 10:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-14 11:08 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2022-04-20 9:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-20 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-20 9:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-20 9:47 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-20 9:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-14 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-14 14:14 ` [tip: irq/core] genirq: Take the proposed affinity at face value if force==true tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2022-04-05 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] irqchip/gic-v3: Always trust the managed affinity provided by the core code Marc Zyngier
2022-04-10 19:12 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2022-04-07 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] genirq: Managed affinity fixes John Garry
2022-04-08 1:02 ` Xiongfeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39f69dfe-32e5-4cb3-118b-5c02b28cbcff@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ddecotig@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®