From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>,
David Decotigny <ddecotig@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] genirq: Managed affinity fixes
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:29:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b14b61cc-ab47-e90d-7f81-f05197645dc6@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405185040.206297-1-maz@kernel.org>
On 05/04/2022 19:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> John (and later on David) reported[1] a while ago that booting with
> maxcpus=1, managed affinity devices would fail to get the interrupts
> that were associated with offlined CPUs.
>
> Similarly, Xiongfeng reported[2] that the GICv3 ITS would sometime use
> non-housekeeping CPUs instead of the affinity that was passed down as
> a parameter.
>
> [1] can be fixed by not trying to activate these interrupts if no CPU
> that can satisfy the affinity is present (a patch addressing this was
> already posted[3])
>
> [2] is a consequence of affinities containing non-online CPUs being
> passed down to the interrupt controller driver and the ITS driver
> trying to paper over that by ignoring the affinity parameter and doing
> its own (stupid) thing. It would be better to (a) get the core code to
> remove the offline CPUs from the affinity mask at all times, and (b)
> fix the drivers so that they can trust the core code not to trip them.
>
> This small series, based on 5.18-rc1, addresses the above.
Hi Marc,
Please let me know if you require anything more from me on this one. I
was hoping that Xiongfeng would verify that his "housekeeping" issues
were fixed.
Cheers
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
>>From v2 [4]:
> - Rebased on 5.18-rc1
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/78615d08-1764-c895-f3b7-bfddfbcbdfb9@huawei.com
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124073440.88598-1-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220307190625.254426-1-maz@kernel.org
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220321193608.975495-1-maz@kernel.org
>
> Marc Zyngier (3):
> genirq/msi: Shutdown managed interrupts with unsatifiable affinities
> genirq: Always limit the affinity to online CPUs
> irqchip/gic-v3: Always trust the managed affinity provided by the core
> code
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 2 +-
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> kernel/irq/msi.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 18:50 Marc Zyngier
2022-04-05 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] genirq/msi: Shutdown managed interrupts with unsatifiable affinities Marc Zyngier
2022-04-10 19:13 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2022-04-05 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] genirq: Always limit the affinity to online CPUs Marc Zyngier
2022-04-10 19:12 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
[not found] ` <CGME20220413145922eucas1p2dc46908354f4d2b48db79978d086a838@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-04-13 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] " Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-13 17:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-14 9:09 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-14 10:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-14 11:08 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-20 9:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-20 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-20 9:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-20 9:47 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-20 9:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-14 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-14 14:14 ` [tip: irq/core] genirq: Take the proposed affinity at face value if force==true tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2022-04-05 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] irqchip/gic-v3: Always trust the managed affinity provided by the core code Marc Zyngier
2022-04-10 19:12 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2022-04-07 17:29 ` John Garry [this message]
2022-04-08 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] genirq: Managed affinity fixes Xiongfeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b14b61cc-ab47-e90d-7f81-f05197645dc6@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=ddecotig@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®