mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuriy Kolerov <Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
	Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	"Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARCv2: IRQ: Set a default priority for all core interrupts
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:54:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ABF60118B9B784CA5BF7C841D2F00EC01037938@de02wembxa.internal.synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dd5743d-cf5b-a65e-86fe-86fff2777e81@synopsys.com>

Hi Vineet,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vineet Gupta [mailto:vgupta@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 8:54 PM
> To: Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com>; linux-snps-
> arc@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com; Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARCv2: IRQ: Set a default priority for all core
> interrupts
> 
> On 01/31/2017 03:45 AM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> > After reset all interrupts in the core interrupt controller has the
> > highest priority P0. If the platform supports Fast IRQs and has more
> > than 1 banks of registers then CPU automatically switch banks of
> > registers when P0 interrupt comes.
> >
> > The problem is that the kernel expects that by default switching of
> > banks is not used by all interrupts. It is necessary to set a default
> > nonzero priority for all available interrupts to avoid undefined
> > behaviour.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arc/kernel/intc-arcv2.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/intc-arcv2.c
> > b/arch/arc/kernel/intc-arcv2.c index 31246cc..d4fa4a5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arc/kernel/intc-arcv2.c
> > +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/intc-arcv2.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> >   */
> >  void arc_init_IRQ(void)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int tmp, irq_prio;
> > +	unsigned int tmp, irq_prio, i;
> >
> >  	struct bcr_irq_arcv2 irq_bcr;
> >
> > @@ -62,6 +62,16 @@ void arc_init_IRQ(void)
> >  		irq_prio + 1, ARCV2_IRQ_DEF_PRIO,
> >  		irq_bcr.firq ? " FIRQ (not used)":"");
> >
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Set a default priority for all available interrupts to prevent
> > +	 * switching of register banks if Fast IRQ and multiple register banks
> > +	 * are supported by CPU.
> > +	 */
> > +	for (i = NR_EXCEPTIONS; i < irq_bcr.irqs + NR_EXCEPTIONS; i++) {
> > +		write_aux_reg(AUX_IRQ_SELECT, i);
> > +		write_aux_reg(AUX_IRQ_PRIORITY, ARCV2_IRQ_DEF_PRIO);
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> This itself is fine. However going forward can we move to the genirq
> irq_cpu_online() etc instead of doing this in our platform per cpu hook ?
> 
> https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2011-03/msg00115.html

We need to set a default priority for all interrupts for each CPU before interrupt controller is configured. In other words it this necessary to guaranty a default state of all interrupts before doing something else with interrupts. Moreover as I understand irq_cpu_online() is intended to be used with virtual IRQs (already allocated interrupts) but the configuration of priorities must be done for all hardware interrupts to bring CPU to the default state.

> >  	/* setup status32, don't enable intr yet as kernel doesn't want */
> >  	tmp = read_aux_reg(ARC_REG_STATUS32);
> >  	tmp |= STATUS_AD_MASK | (ARCV2_IRQ_DEF_PRIO << 1);
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-01 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-31 11:45 [PATCH v2 0/4] Use build registers for getting numbers of interrupts Yuriy Kolerov
2017-01-31 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARCv2: IRQ: Move structure for build register of core intc to the header Yuriy Kolerov
2017-01-31 17:40   ` Vineet Gupta
2017-01-31 18:15   ` Vineet Gupta
2017-01-31 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARCv2: IRQ: Remove option for setting number of interrupts Yuriy Kolerov
2017-01-31 17:40   ` Vineet Gupta
2017-01-31 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARCv2: IRQ: Use build registers for getting numbers " Yuriy Kolerov
2017-01-31 17:46   ` Vineet Gupta
2017-01-31 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARCv2: IRQ: Set a default priority for all core interrupts Yuriy Kolerov
2017-01-31 17:54   ` Vineet Gupta
2017-02-01 12:54     ` Yuriy Kolerov [this message]
2017-02-01 20:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Use build registers for getting numbers of interrupts Vineet Gupta
2017-02-01 23:59   ` Yuriy Kolerov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ABF60118B9B784CA5BF7C841D2F00EC01037938@de02wembxa.internal.synopsys.com \
    --to=yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®