* Still no ramfs usage limits in 2.5.9 or 2.4.19-pre8
@ 2002-05-16 16:49 Dale Farnsworth
2002-05-16 18:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-17 11:01 ` Padraig Brady
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dale Farnsworth @ 2002-05-16 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds, linux-kernel
David Gibson produced a patch about 18 months ago that added usage limits
to ramfs. <http://ozlabs.org/people/dgibson/dwg-ramfs.patch>
Through 2.4.10, the AC kernel series carried this patch.
Linus' kernel from 2.4.11 onward adopted only one line from the
patch, the following attribution comment:
"Usage limits added by David Gibson, Linuxcare Australia."
The usage limit code is missing, however.
Was this a simple mistake that has been overlooked? Or are there
drawbacks to applying the patch that keep it out of the mainstream
kernels?
-Dale Farnsworth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Still no ramfs usage limits in 2.5.9 or 2.4.19-pre8
2002-05-16 16:49 Still no ramfs usage limits in 2.5.9 or 2.4.19-pre8 Dale Farnsworth
@ 2002-05-16 18:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-17 11:01 ` Padraig Brady
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-05-16 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dale Farnsworth; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel
> David Gibson produced a patch about 18 months ago that added usage limits
> to ramfs. <http://ozlabs.org/people/dgibson/dwg-ramfs.patch>
>
> Through 2.4.10, the AC kernel series carried this patch.
>
> Linus' kernel from 2.4.11 onward adopted only one line from the
> patch, the following attribution comment:
> "Usage limits added by David Gibson, Linuxcare Australia."
>
> The usage limit code is missing, however.
Linus certainly never added it, or the address space hooks it needed. It
should have been added though definitely
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Still no ramfs usage limits in 2.5.9 or 2.4.19-pre8
2002-05-16 16:49 Still no ramfs usage limits in 2.5.9 or 2.4.19-pre8 Dale Farnsworth
2002-05-16 18:11 ` Alan Cox
@ 2002-05-17 11:01 ` Padraig Brady
2002-05-17 12:18 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Padraig Brady @ 2002-05-17 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dale Farnsworth; +Cc: linux-kernel
Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> David Gibson produced a patch about 18 months ago that added usage limits
> to ramfs. <http://ozlabs.org/people/dgibson/dwg-ramfs.patch>
>
> Through 2.4.10, the AC kernel series carried this patch.
>
> Linus' kernel from 2.4.11 onward adopted only one line from the
> patch, the following attribution comment:
> "Usage limits added by David Gibson, Linuxcare Australia."
>
> The usage limit code is missing, however.
>
> Was this a simple mistake that has been overlooked? Or are there
> drawbacks to applying the patch that keep it out of the mainstream
> kernels?
>
> -Dale Farnsworth
Linus said the code should be kept as simple
as possible because it's only an example file system.
However simple should also not mean practically useless.
Also as of 2.5 it's mandatory, so it should get the
limit code IMHO. There are also a few other patches
floating around for ramfs:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100553363224376&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98701101629272&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100753902321780&w=2
Padraig.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-17 11:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-16 16:49 Still no ramfs usage limits in 2.5.9 or 2.4.19-pre8 Dale Farnsworth
2002-05-16 18:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-17 11:01 ` Padraig Brady
2002-05-17 12:18 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®