From: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Cc: "Cornelia Huck" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"Greg KH" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:19:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ae72650707241719w6c7f2dc7s1bc29d7f1dfd4288@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46A62F6A.8010403@simon.arlott.org.uk>
On 7/24/07, Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> wrote:
> On 24/07/07 17:34, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On 7/24/07, Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> wrote:
> >> On 24/07/07 13:54, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:20:02 +0200,
> >> > "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> It looks fine to me. "device" links must never point to anything else
> >> >> than a bus device.
While it's still true, for input we have special rules because the
"stacked class devices" existed only there. At least for
SYSFS_DEPRECATED, all input devices should have a "device" symlink
pointing to the bus-device.
> >> > Hm, but then
> >> > 1. The patch sneaks this check in (the old code only checked for
> >> > dev->parent)
> >> > 2. The code is rather inconsistent now, since none of the other code
> >> > paths check for dev->parent->bus...
Yeah, that's true.
> >> Removing the dev->parent->bus check fixes it:
Yes, let's remove the check, I will check now if we possibly need to
fix more than this or only the block-device patch.
Thanks,
Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-25 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-24 6:39 sysfs/udev broken in latest git? Simon Arlott
2007-07-24 7:25 ` Greg KH
2007-07-24 8:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-07-24 8:46 ` Greg KH
2007-07-24 9:20 ` Kay Sievers
2007-07-24 11:49 ` Simon Arlott
2007-07-24 11:55 ` Kay Sievers
2007-07-24 12:00 ` Simon Arlott
2007-07-24 12:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-07-24 16:28 ` sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?) Simon Arlott
2007-07-24 16:34 ` Kay Sievers
2007-07-24 16:57 ` Simon Arlott
2007-07-25 0:19 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2007-07-25 7:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-07-26 0:11 ` Greg KH
2007-07-26 0:17 ` Kay Sievers
2007-07-30 19:12 ` patch driver-core-revert-device-link-creation-check.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ae72650707241719w6c7f2dc7s1bc29d7f1dfd4288@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®