From: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com>
To: Gilad Benjamini <gilad@altornetworks.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: epoll and closed file descriptors
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:28:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e8340490909161728n5dc5f90gc0ab261bd5cec33e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <024601ca372d$09ad9fb0$1d08df10$@com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Gilad Benjamini
<gilad@altornetworks.com> wrote:
> Davide wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Gilad Benjamini wrote:
>>
>> > I am running repeatedly into a scenario where epoll notifies
>> userland of
>> > events on a closed file descriptor.
>> > I am running a single thread application, on a single CPU machine so
>> > multiple threads isn't the issue.
>> >
>> > A sample set of events that I have seen
>> > - File descriptor (13) for a socket is closed
>> > - epoll_wait returns with no events.
>> > - Several epoll related calls happen
>> > - More than 20 seconds after the "close", epoll_wait finds an event
>> on fd 13
>> > with EPOLLIN|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP.
>> > - epoll_wait continues to report this event
>>
>> Epoll removes the fd from its container, when the last instance of the
>> underlying kernel file pointer is released (or when you explicitly
>> remove it with epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL)).
>> If you continue to get the event, it means that someone else has an
>> instance of the socket (that, looking at the events, saw a shutdown)
>> open,
>> by hence keeping the kernel object alive.
>> If you don't want to see the events, just remove the socket from the
>> epoll
>> set before closing.
>> Or, you remove the socket the first time you see an EPOLLHUP.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Davide
>
> I would, but epoll is preventing me from doing so.
> Early in sys_epoll_ctl there are these lines
>
> file = fget(epfd);
> if (!file)
> goto error_return;
>
> Leaving me in a kind of dead lock
You could dup() the file descriptor before handing it to curl, and use
your own copy for epoll operations.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 23:22 Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-09-17 0:23 ` Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:28 ` Bryan Donlan [this message]
2009-09-17 0:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-09-17 0:40 ` Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:45 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-09-17 0:53 ` Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:57 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-09-17 0:55 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e8340490909161728n5dc5f90gc0ab261bd5cec33e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bdonlan@gmail.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=gilad@altornetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®