From: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com>
To: Gilad Benjamini <gilad@altornetworks.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: epoll and closed file descriptors
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:45:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e8340490909161745h5c58c165j1726c3433df3baeb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <024701ca372f$81412040$83c360c0$@com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Gilad Benjamini
<gilad@altornetworks.com> wrote:
> Davide wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Gilad Benjamini wrote:
>>
>> > I would, but epoll is preventing me from doing so.
>> > Early in sys_epoll_ctl there are these lines
>> >
>> > file = fget(epfd);
>> > if (!file)
>> > goto error_return;
>> >
>> > Leaving me in a kind of dead lock
>>
>> The 'epfd' in there, is the _epoll fd_, which, if fget() fails, means
>> you
>> close it.
>> You see likely failing the 'tfile = fget(fd)' (of course, you closed
>> it),
>> so if someone else keeps the socket open and you have no chance in
>> telling
>> it to drop it (really?), you need to remove the socket from the set
>> before
>> closing it.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Davide
>
> My bad. I meant to quote the line that you mentioned.
> I agree that the right thing to do is to remove the fd from epoll before
> closing it.
> However, due to the way curl works, I cannot do that. Changing the curl code
> doesn't seem trivial.
>
> Regardless, I still don't see how the kernel got into this situation, and if
> this situation is valid, why it doesn't bail out of it.
epoll references the underlying file object; the fd is used _only_ to
obtain this file object, and then never used again. Determining when
the fd goes away then requires iterating over all fds, and since epoll
was designed to avoid doing exactly that, it isn't an acceptable
solution.
As I mentioned in the other email, by dup()ing the file descriptor,
you can get control over when the copy is closed without changing
curl. Then just make sure to remove it from the epoll set before
closing your copy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 23:22 Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-09-17 0:23 ` Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:28 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-09-17 0:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-09-17 0:40 ` Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:45 ` Bryan Donlan [this message]
2009-09-17 0:53 ` Gilad Benjamini
2009-09-17 0:57 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-09-17 0:55 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e8340490909161745h5c58c165j1726c3433df3baeb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bdonlan@gmail.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=gilad@altornetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®