From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>
Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] MIPS: Only change $28 to thread_info if coming from user mode
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:27:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40031221.jIbnRxB01Q@np-p-burton> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1612051605590.6743@tp.orcam.me.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 934 bytes --]
Hi Maciej,
> Overall I think all <asm/stackframe.h> code should be using the (default)
> `.set reorder' mode, perhaps forced explicitly in case these macros are
> pasted into `.set noreorder' code, to make it easier to avoid subtle data
> dependency bugs, and also to make R6 porting easier. Except maybe for the
> RFE sequence, for readability's sake, although even there GAS will do the
> right thing. Surely the BLTZ/MOVE piece does not have to be `.set
> noreorder' as GAS will schedule that delay slot automatically if allowed
> to.
Agreed we ought to use .set reorder (or rather, not use .set noreorder)
wherever possible but FYI one thing I've only noticed recently is that we
don't actually get any reordering anyway, presumably because we don't provide
any -O flags when building asm source. I haven't yet done the legwork or
figuring out whether we've ever had optimisation & if so what changed...
Thanks,
Paul
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-05 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 13:39 [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: Add per-cpu IRQ stack Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] MIPS: Introduce irq_stack Matt Redfearn
2016-12-06 22:13 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-12-07 9:25 ` Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] MIPS: Stack unwinding while on IRQ stack Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] MIPS: Only change $28 to thread_info if coming from user mode Matt Redfearn
2016-12-05 16:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-12-05 16:52 ` Matt Redfearn
2016-12-05 17:22 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-12-05 17:27 ` Paul Burton [this message]
2016-12-05 17:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] MIPS: Switch to the irq_stack in interrupts Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] MIPS: Select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK Matt Redfearn
2016-12-06 22:09 ` [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: Add per-cpu IRQ stack Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-12-07 9:30 ` Matt Redfearn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40031221.jIbnRxB01Q@np-p-burton \
--to=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@imgtec.com \
--cc=matt.redfearn@imgtec.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®