From: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: Add per-cpu IRQ stack
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:30:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f778311-6d4d-cc57-00db-db2141803416@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pEB6uBJN0AWh4igmfbxSya1e8eYXdDp_dwRZZZGPjVug@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jason,
On 06/12/16 22:09, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks for submitting this. A happy OpenWRT/WireGuard user has
> reported to me that this patch set frees ~1300 bytes of stack on a
> small MIPS router. This kind of savings should allow me to reintroduce
> my crypto operations to be on the stack, rather than the conditional
> MIPS kmallocing, which will be a performance win.
Excellent.
>
> By the way, it looks like x86 and SPARC have separately allocated hard
> IRQ and soft IRQ stacks. ARM has only one for both, similar to this
> MIPS patchset.
The separate stack for soft-IRQs could be added as well, but of course
there is a tradeoff against the additional memory consumed by it. I
believe that most soft IRQs will now be handled on the new irq stack,
because HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK causes them to be invoked within
irq_exit, while still executing on the irq stack
Thanks,
Matt
>
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> wrote:
>> This series adds a separate stack for each CPU wihin the system to use
>> when handling IRQs. Previously IRQs were handled on the kernel stack of
>> the current task. If that task was deep down a call stack at the point
>> of the interrupt, and handling the interrupt required a deep IRQ stack,
>> then there was a likelihood of stack overflow. Since the kernel stack
>> is in normal unmapped memory, overflowing it can lead to silent
>> corruption of other kernel data, with weird and wonderful results.
>>
>> Before this patch series, ftracing the maximum stack size of a v4.9-rc6
>> kernel running on a Ci40 board gave:
>> 4996
>>
>> And with this series:
>> 4084
>>
>> Handling interrupts on a separate stack reduces the maximum kernel stack
>> usage in this configuration by ~900 bytes.
>>
>> Since do_IRQ is now invoked on a separate stack, we select
>> HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK so that softirqs will also be executed on the
>> irq stack rather than attempting to switch with do_softirq_own_stack().
>>
>> This series has been tested on MIPS Boston, Malta and SEAD3 platforms,
>> Pistachio on the Creator Ci40 board and Cavium Octeon III.
>>
>>
>>
>> Matt Redfearn (5):
>> MIPS: Introduce irq_stack
>> MIPS: Stack unwinding while on IRQ stack
>> MIPS: Only change $28 to thread_info if coming from user mode
>> MIPS: Switch to the irq_stack in interrupts
>> MIPS: Select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK
>>
>> arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/mips/include/asm/irq.h | 12 ++++++
>> arch/mips/include/asm/stackframe.h | 10 +++++
>> arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
>> arch/mips/kernel/genex.S | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> arch/mips/kernel/irq.c | 11 ++++++
>> arch/mips/kernel/process.c | 15 ++++++-
>> 7 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 13:39 Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] MIPS: Introduce irq_stack Matt Redfearn
2016-12-06 22:13 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-12-07 9:25 ` Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] MIPS: Stack unwinding while on IRQ stack Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] MIPS: Only change $28 to thread_info if coming from user mode Matt Redfearn
2016-12-05 16:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-12-05 16:52 ` Matt Redfearn
2016-12-05 17:22 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-12-05 17:27 ` Paul Burton
2016-12-05 17:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] MIPS: Switch to the irq_stack in interrupts Matt Redfearn
2016-12-02 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] MIPS: Select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK Matt Redfearn
2016-12-06 22:09 ` [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: Add per-cpu IRQ stack Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-12-07 9:30 ` Matt Redfearn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f778311-6d4d-cc57-00db-db2141803416@imgtec.com \
--to=matt.redfearn@imgtec.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea.gelmini@gelma.net \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@imgtec.com \
--cc=marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®