From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<hongyu.ning@intel.com>, <chen.yu@linux.dev>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/12] x86/resctrl: Do not enable ERDT when Sub-NUMA Cluster is enabled
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:54:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ed95c5-a103-4139-a802-893c4bc8a497@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eefa12618e3be5b5e19a88a343d192ab8d9049ae.1791933001.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Hi Chenyu,
On 10/13/26 7:58 PM, Chen Yu wrote:
> ERDT cannot coexist with SNC(Sub-NUMA-Clustering). The definition of SNC
"Sub-NUMA-Clustering" -> "Sub-NUMA-Cluster mode"
> is to 'divide' an L3 into smaller L3 slices by mapping addresses to
> different L3 slices. The current platform with ERDT enabled has several
> L3 per socket, and it will not be divided into smaller slices.
> Furthermore, ERDT has only L3 scope for the CPU agent, and there are no
> node-scope domains.
>
> snc_nodes_per_l3_cache is calculated in rdt_get_l3_mon_config(), which
> runs after erdt_init() has parsed the ACPI ERDT table. Introduce
> resctrl_arch_update_snc() to do that calculation and call it from
> get_rdt_resources() before erdt_init(). Leave ERDT disabled if SNC is
> detected and keep using the legacy MSR based CMT interface. Do this check
> while parsing the ERDT table so that platforms that do not provide an
> ERDT table at all stay silent.
Please do not just narrate the code in changelog but instead describe
at high level in regular language what the change does.
>
> Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 7fadfebb5312..0ea888807bd0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,7 @@ static __init bool get_rdt_resources(void)
> {
> bool ret;
>
> + resctrl_arch_update_snc();
"resctrl_arch_..." is the common prefix for helpers found in include/linux/resctrl.h that all
architectures are required to implement.
Is a helper really needed here? It is just one line, could it just be open coded?
> erdt_init();
> rdt_alloc_capable = get_rdt_alloc_resources();
> rdt_mon_capable = get_rdt_mon_resources();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> index eb5e262e243a..d94c54617fa1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,18 @@ static __init int enumerate_erdt_table(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * ERDT describes monitoring resources per L3 cache domain, while SNC
> + * splits an L3 cache into NUMA node scoped monitoring domains. The two
> + * cannot be matched up, so leave ERDT disabled and fall back to the
> + * MSR based CMT interface. snc_nodes_per_l3_cache has been computed by
"MSR CMT interface" - this restriction is not specific to CMT, is it? Could "CMT"
just be dropped?
Last sentence of comment can be dropped. It surely will be a bug if snc_nodes_per_l3_cache
is not initialized before it is used here and one can just go find where that happens.
> + * resctrl_arch_update_snc() before erdt_init() is called.
> + */
> + if (snc_nodes_per_l3_cache > 1) {
Looks like this check occurs *after* parsing of ERDT table already started. Could this
be moved to be the first check to avoid that unnecessary work?
> + pr_info("Not supported with Sub-NUMA Cluster enabled, using legacy CMT\n");
"using legacy CMT" ERDT is not limited to CMT so this can just be dropped?
I understand that the pr_info() adds an "ERDT:" prefix but I think it will be useful
to include in this message that ERDT in its entirety is not supported:
"ERDT not supported with Sub-NUMA Cluster enabled".
I think this work could be integrated better by switching the order between
this patch and "x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and save CACD cpumask per RMD",
separating the change to where snc_nodes_per_l3_cache is initialized and the new
dependency by moving just this hunk to "x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and save
CACD cpumask per RMD" with a note in the changelog that ERDT and SNC are not compatible.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> for (subtbl = (void *)erdt + sizeof(*erdt);
> subtbl_valid((void *)erdt + erdt->header.length, subtbl);
> subtbl = next_subtbl(subtbl)) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index e2f3b884847c..34d29f719076 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ static inline struct rdt_hw_resource *resctrl_to_arch_res(struct rdt_resource *r
>
> extern struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[];
>
> +extern int snc_nodes_per_l3_cache;
> +
> void arch_mon_domain_online(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_l3_mon_domain *d);
>
> /* CPUID.(EAX=10H, ECX=ResID=1).EAX */
> @@ -251,6 +253,7 @@ union l3_qos_abmc_cfg {
> void rdt_ctrl_update(void *arg);
>
> int rdt_get_l3_mon_config(struct rdt_resource *r);
> +__init void resctrl_arch_update_snc(void);
>
> bool rdt_cpu_has(int flag);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 3838e0a13d36..6e46f10d8640 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ bool rdt_mon_capable;
>
> #define CF(cf) ((unsigned long)(1048576 * (cf) + 0.5))
>
> -static int snc_nodes_per_l3_cache = 1;
> +int snc_nodes_per_l3_cache = 1;
>
> /*
> * The correction factor table is documented in Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst.
> @@ -416,6 +416,11 @@ static __init int snc_get_config(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +__init void resctrl_arch_update_snc(void)
> +{
> + snc_nodes_per_l3_cache = snc_get_config();
> +}
> +
This looks unnecessary. Could all these references to snc_nodes_per_l3_cache be dropped
from monitor.c?
Definition of snc_nodes_per_l3_cache could be moved to core.c where it is
initialized now and its initialization could just be open coded in get_rdt_resources().
> int __init rdt_get_l3_mon_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> unsigned int mbm_offset = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_mbm_width_offset;
> @@ -423,8 +428,6 @@ int __init rdt_get_l3_mon_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> unsigned int threshold;
> u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>
> - snc_nodes_per_l3_cache = snc_get_config();
> -
> resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024;
> hw_res->mon_scale = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_occ_scale / snc_nodes_per_l3_cache;
> r->mon.num_rmid = (boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_rmid + 1) / snc_nodes_per_l3_cache;
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 2:56 [PATCH v9 00/12] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
2026-10-14 2:57 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] x86/topology: Export topo_lookup_cpuid() for resctrl use Chen Yu
2026-10-14 2:58 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] x86/resctrl: Require 64-bit x86 for resctrl support Chen Yu
2026-10-23 23:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-14 2:58 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and save CACD cpumask per RMD Chen Yu
2026-10-23 23:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-14 2:58 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] x86/resctrl: Do not enable ERDT when Sub-NUMA Cluster is enabled Chen Yu
2026-10-23 23:54 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-10-14 2:58 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] x86/resctrl: Attach ACPI ERDT information to L3 mon domain on CPU online Chen Yu
2026-10-23 23:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-24 0:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-14 2:59 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] x86,fs/resctrl: Move resctrl_arch_round_mon_val() out of line Chen Yu
2026-10-23 23:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-14 2:59 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] x86/resctrl: Add a global ERDT monitor scale Chen Yu
2026-10-24 0:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-14 2:59 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table Chen Yu
2026-10-14 3:00 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] x86/resctrl: Refactor the monitor read function Chen Yu
2026-10-14 3:00 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Chen Yu
2026-10-14 3:00 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] x86/resctrl: Introduce erdt_cpu_has() and erdt_support() Chen Yu
2026-10-14 3:01 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] x86/resctrl: Add MMIO-based LLC occupancy monitoring support Chen Yu
2026-10-24 0:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v9 00/12] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40ed95c5-a103-4139-a802-893c4bc8a497@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chen.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hongyu.ning@intel.com \
--cc=hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®