From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
To: 최찬우 <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: 김재원 <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 01:29:50 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <411808660.660571433726990534.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas07c> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 2178 bytes --]
>
> On 06/05/2015 01:54 PM, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> >>
> >> IRQ signal before driver probe is needless because driver sends
> >> current state after platform booting done.
> >> So, this patch clears MUIC IRQ bits before request IRQ.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > Q1. Is this because the pending bits are USELESS?
> > or because the pendeing bits incurs INCORRECT behaviors?
>
> The max77843 datasheet includes following sentence:
> - "All bits are cleared after a read" about INT1/INT2/INT3 register.
> There are no problem about interrupt handling.
>
> >
> > Q2. Does clearing (by reading) INT1 do everything you need?
> > What about INT2 and INT3?
>
> The MAXIM MAX77843 MUIC support the one more interrupts (e.g., ADC1K, VBVolt, ChgTyp ...).
> The each interrupt is included in the one register among INT1/2/3.
>
> This patch clear the all interrupts of MAX77843 before requesting the interrupts.
>
> >
> > Q3. I presume that "driver sends current state after..." is
> > coming from the invokation of "queue_delayed_work()" at the end
> > of the probe function. It appears that you are only serving
> > the pending status of "cable detection" with it while INT1
> > seems to have more functionalities. Does that delayed work
> > do everything that are pending, really?
>
> When completed kernel booting, the delayed work of extcon-max77843.c driver
> use the MAX77843_MUIC_STATUSx register to detect the type of connected
> external connectors. So, there are no problme about clearing all bits of INT1/2/3 interrupt register.
>
> If user-space platform don't finish the initialization of all user-process daemons
> and extcon driver send the uevent during only kernel booting, the uevent is not handled
> on user-space daemons.
>
> Thanks,
> Chanwoo Choi
Ok. Looks Good. Thanks for the explanation.
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
reply other threads:[~2015-06-08 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=411808660.660571433726990534.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas07c \
--to=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jaewon02.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®