* Re: Re: [PATCH] extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ
@ 2015-06-08 1:29 MyungJoo Ham
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2015-06-08 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 최찬우
Cc: 김재원, linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 2178 bytes --]
>
> On 06/05/2015 01:54 PM, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> >>
> >> IRQ signal before driver probe is needless because driver sends
> >> current state after platform booting done.
> >> So, this patch clears MUIC IRQ bits before request IRQ.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > Q1. Is this because the pending bits are USELESS?
> > or because the pendeing bits incurs INCORRECT behaviors?
>
> The max77843 datasheet includes following sentence:
> - "All bits are cleared after a read" about INT1/INT2/INT3 register.
> There are no problem about interrupt handling.
>
> >
> > Q2. Does clearing (by reading) INT1 do everything you need?
> > What about INT2 and INT3?
>
> The MAXIM MAX77843 MUIC support the one more interrupts (e.g., ADC1K, VBVolt, ChgTyp ...).
> The each interrupt is included in the one register among INT1/2/3.
>
> This patch clear the all interrupts of MAX77843 before requesting the interrupts.
>
> >
> > Q3. I presume that "driver sends current state after..." is
> > coming from the invokation of "queue_delayed_work()" at the end
> > of the probe function. It appears that you are only serving
> > the pending status of "cable detection" with it while INT1
> > seems to have more functionalities. Does that delayed work
> > do everything that are pending, really?
>
> When completed kernel booting, the delayed work of extcon-max77843.c driver
> use the MAX77843_MUIC_STATUSx register to detect the type of connected
> external connectors. So, there are no problme about clearing all bits of INT1/2/3 interrupt register.
>
> If user-space platform don't finish the initialization of all user-process daemons
> and extcon driver send the uevent during only kernel booting, the uevent is not handled
> on user-space daemons.
>
> Thanks,
> Chanwoo Choi
Ok. Looks Good. Thanks for the explanation.
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-06-08 1:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-08 1:29 Re: [PATCH] extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ MyungJoo Ham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®