mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
To: Nuno Silva <nuno.silva@vgertech.com>
Cc: list linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID resync speed
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 13:18:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4322506A.1010303@eyal.emu.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43224ABB.3030002@vgertech.com>

Nuno Silva wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>
>> I noticed that my 3-disk RAID was syncing at about 40MB/s, now that I
>> added a fourth disk it goes at only 20+MB/s. This is on an idle machine.
>
> 3*40=120
>
> 4*20=80

What does this mean? The raid is syncing at 20MB/s, not each disk, so I do
not see what the multiplication is about.

>> Individually, each disk measures 60+MB/s with hdparm.
>
> And concurrent hdparms? Or some dd's concurrently?

I do not see this as relevant, but four concurrent hdparms (each to a
different disk) give about 30MB/s per disk. I expect the controller
to talk to the four disks at their full speed so concurrency should
not be the issue.

>> kernel: 2.6.13 on ia32
>> Controller: Promise SATAII150 TX4
>> Disks: WD 320GB SATA
>>
>> Q: Is this the way the raid code works? The way the disk-io is
>> managed? Or
>> could it be due to the SATA controller?
>
> You can isolate the performance drop with some dd's. Maybe this card is
> in a pci32/33mhz and you're hitting the pci bus' limits? (120~130MB/sec).

'hdparm -T' gives about 1250 MB/sec so this is not the limiting
factor.

> Regards,
> Nuno Silva

-- 
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
	attach .zip as .dat

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-10  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-10  2:11 Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-10  2:53 ` Nuno Silva
2005-09-10  3:18   ` Eyal Lebedinsky [this message]
2005-09-10  4:54     ` Nuno Silva
2005-09-10  5:16       ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-09-11  2:16       ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-12 15:57         ` Roger Heflin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4322506A.1010303@eyal.emu.id.au \
    --to=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.silva@vgertech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®