From: Nuno Silva <nuno.silva@vgertech.com>
To: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
Cc: list linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID resync speed
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:54:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43226701.1000606@vgertech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4322506A.1010303@eyal.emu.id.au>
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> Nuno Silva wrote:
>>Hi,
>>Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>>>I noticed that my 3-disk RAID was syncing at about 40MB/s, now that I
>>>added a fourth disk it goes at only 20+MB/s. This is on an idle machine.
>>3*40=120
>>4*20=80
> What does this mean? The raid is syncing at 20MB/s, not each disk, so I do
> not see what the multiplication is about.
Yes, you're correct :-)
>>>Individually, each disk measures 60+MB/s with hdparm.
>>And concurrent hdparms? Or some dd's concurrently?
>
> I do not see this as relevant, but four concurrent hdparms (each to a
> different disk) give about 30MB/s per disk. I expect the controller
> to talk to the four disks at their full speed so concurrency should
> not be the issue.
I guess you're using linux's software raid?
If so, you're hitting the 120MB/sec (and I *think* this time I'm
correct! :-)
If this is a PCI32/33mhz slot you're not going to be able to get more
juice. (I bet that 3 concurrent dd's gets you 40MB each).
Anyway, this may be offtopic because the problem (only 20MB/sec for the
raid with 4 disks) should be something else... Sorry for the noise.
>>>kernel: 2.6.13 on ia32
>>>Controller: Promise SATAII150 TX4
>>>Disks: WD 320GB SATA
>>>
>>>Q: Is this the way the raid code works? The way the disk-io is
>>>managed? Or
>>>could it be due to the SATA controller?
>>
>>You can isolate the performance drop with some dd's. Maybe this card is
>>in a pci32/33mhz and you're hitting the pci bus' limits? (120~130MB/sec).
>
>
> 'hdparm -T' gives about 1250 MB/sec so this is not the limiting
> factor.
Mine outputs some fabulous values too... I'm not sure I trust them ;)
# hdparm -T /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 3536 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1767.38 MB/sec
Regards,
Nuno Silva
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-10 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-10 2:11 Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-10 2:53 ` Nuno Silva
2005-09-10 3:18 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-10 4:54 ` Nuno Silva [this message]
2005-09-10 5:16 ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-09-11 2:16 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-12 15:57 ` Roger Heflin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43226701.1000606@vgertech.com \
--to=nuno.silva@vgertech.com \
--cc=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®