From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
To: Nuno Silva <nuno.silva@vgertech.com>
Cc: list linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID resync speed
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:16:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43239374.8010604@eyal.emu.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43226701.1000606@vgertech.com>
Nuno Silva wrote:
> Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>
>> Nuno Silva wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>>>
>>>> I noticed that my 3-disk RAID was syncing at about 40MB/s, now that I
>>>> added a fourth disk it goes at only 20+MB/s. This is on an idle
>>>> machine.
>>>
>>> 3*40=120
>>> 4*20=80
>>
>> What does this mean? The raid is syncing at 20MB/s, not each disk, so
>> I do
>> not see what the multiplication is about.
>
> Yes, you're correct :-)
Actually, I took another look at this matter and I now think that you
had the correct approach.
The rebuild speed is the speed at which the new disk is being built, not
the total rebuild i/o. This means that it does not contain the read
operations. So the PCI limit is a limiting factor. On a 32-bit 33MHz PCI
controller (132MB/s theoretical bandwidth) a 2->3 rebuild cannot be
faster 44MB/s and a 3->4 is limited to 33MB/s.
I think this is true.
The same limit will also apply to any raid i/o as we read/write to all
the disks for any data.
To use 5 60MB/s disks I will need 300MB/s bandwidth which a 64-bit 66MHz
PCI can deliver. A 32-bit/66MHz will come close - what can PCIe do?.
A proper RAID card will alleviate the PCI limitation as it will have
dedicated channels for each disk (well, a good controller should) with
full bandwidth and the PCI will only need to go at the one-disk speed
(for raid-5).
On-board SATA controllers will have better bandwidth if they sit on a
better than PCI bus (or on more than one PCI bus).
--
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
attach .zip as .dat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-10 2:11 Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-10 2:53 ` Nuno Silva
2005-09-10 3:18 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-10 4:54 ` Nuno Silva
2005-09-10 5:16 ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-09-11 2:16 ` Eyal Lebedinsky [this message]
2005-09-12 15:57 ` Roger Heflin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43239374.8010604@eyal.emu.id.au \
--to=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.silva@vgertech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®