mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: j4K3xBl4sT3r <jakexblaster@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:40:44 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <436c596f0603121640h4f286d53h9f1dd177fd0475a4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello all,

I've been seeing many Linux versions, with many features, some of them
just for the newest branches (2.4.x and 2.6.x), I would like to know
for which kind of system each kernel is recommended. On the distros
that we see inside the Net there is the 2.4.x series, normally I
update to 2.6.x (in case of my Slackware 10.2, even getting problems
with some devices). Is that floppy disks uses only 2.0.x and 2.2.x
Kernels? If applicable, where can I get (detailed) information about
these issues? I'm new on Kernel managing, started doing my own distros
at less than one month and would like to know it.

Thanks in advanced,
j4k3.

             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-13  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-13  0:40 j4K3xBl4sT3r [this message]
2006-03-13  8:00 ` Lexington Luthor
2006-03-15  1:35   ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15  1:46     ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-13  8:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 18:03   ` Grant Coady
2006-03-13 18:06     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-14  6:21       ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-14  7:29         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-14  8:18           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14  9:05           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 15:54             ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-16 15:24             ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 10:03         ` Grant Coady
2006-03-14 22:21           ` Russell King
2006-03-15  0:46             ` Grant Coady
     [not found]               ` <20060315080313.GC3166@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-15  9:37                 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:53             ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:32               ` Grant Coady
2006-03-16  4:19                 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16  8:12                   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16  8:31                     ` Lee Revell
2006-03-16  8:55                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16  9:20                         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16  2:55               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-03-13 18:27   ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-13 18:41     ` Lee Revell
2006-03-13 19:01       ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-14  0:18         ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 19:08     ` Diego Calleja
2006-03-13 22:00     ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:01       ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 22:20         ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:33           ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-16 12:03             ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 22:25         ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14  3:53           ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:57     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:10       ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-16 13:39         ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=436c596f0603121640h4f286d53h9f1dd177fd0475a4@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jakexblaster@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®