From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@drugphish.ch>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:24:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <440E2428.5030303@drugphish.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603071819_MC3-1-BA15-3119@compuserve.com>
>>The attached patch documents the Linux kernel's memory barriers.
>
> References:
>
> AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming
> Chapter 7.1: Memory-Access Ordering
> Chapter 7.4: Buffering and Combining Memory Writes
>
> IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer’s Manual, Volume 3:
> System Programming Guide
> Chapter 7.1: Locked Atomic Operations
> Chapter 7.2: Memory Ordering
> Chapter 7.4: Serializing Instructions
Do you guys reckon it might be worthwhile adding Sparc's sequential
consistency, TSO, RMO and PSO models, although I think only RMO is used
in the Linux kernel? References can be found for example in:
Solaris Internals, Core Kernel Architecture, p63-68:
Chapter 3.3: Hardware Considerations for Locks and
Synchronization
Unix Systems for Modern Architectures, Symmetric Multiprocessing
and Caching for Kernel Programmers:
Chapter 13 : Other Memory Models
Or is DaveM the only one fiddling with Sparc memory barriers implementation?
Regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo
'[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-08 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-07 23:17 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-08 0:15 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08 0:24 ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
[not found] <5NONi-2hp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NOtZ-1FO-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NPgs-2Rw-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NPq4-34a-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-08 0:22 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] ` <5NQ2U-462-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NRLg-6LJ-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NRUR-6Yo-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NUSF-30Z-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-08 1:10 ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-08 11:35 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 14:55 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-07 17:40 David Howells
2006-03-07 10:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 18:30 ` David Howells
2006-03-07 11:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 18:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-03-07 19:23 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-07 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 20:01 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-03-07 21:14 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-07 21:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-08 0:36 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 0:35 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 19:24 ` David Howells
2006-03-07 19:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 18:54 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-07 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-07 19:15 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-09 11:26 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-07 19:33 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 20:09 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 0:32 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 8:25 ` Duncan Sands
2006-03-08 22:06 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 22:24 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 22:42 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 2:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 3:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 3:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 7:41 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 12:34 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 16:40 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-08 13:19 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 21:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 22:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-10 0:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-03-08 16:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-08 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 17:35 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 17:59 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 20:16 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 22:01 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-09 11:41 ` David Howells
2006-03-09 12:28 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-09 13:02 ` David Howells
2006-03-09 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 17:39 ` David Howells
2006-03-09 17:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=440E2428.5030303@drugphish.ch \
--to=ratz@drugphish.ch \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome