mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@drugphish.ch>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:24:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <440E2428.5030303@drugphish.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603071819_MC3-1-BA15-3119@compuserve.com>

>>The attached patch documents the Linux kernel's memory barriers.
> 
> References:
> 
> AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming
>         Chapter 7.1: Memory-Access Ordering
>         Chapter 7.4: Buffering and Combining Memory Writes
> 
> IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer’s Manual, Volume 3:
> System Programming Guide
>         Chapter 7.1: Locked Atomic Operations
>         Chapter 7.2: Memory Ordering
>         Chapter 7.4: Serializing Instructions

Do you guys reckon it might be worthwhile adding Sparc's sequential 
consistency, TSO, RMO and PSO models, although I think only RMO is used 
in the Linux kernel? References can be found for example in:

   Solaris Internals, Core Kernel Architecture, p63-68:
           Chapter 3.3: Hardware Considerations for Locks and
                        Synchronization

   Unix Systems for Modern Architectures, Symmetric Multiprocessing
   and Caching for Kernel Programmers:
           Chapter 13 : Other Memory Models

Or is DaveM the only one fiddling with Sparc memory barriers implementation?

Regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
-- 
echo 
'[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-08  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-07 23:17 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-08  0:15 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08  0:24 ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
     [not found] <5NONi-2hp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <5NOtZ-1FO-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5NPgs-2Rw-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <5NPq4-34a-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-08  0:22       ` Robert Hancock
     [not found] ` <5NQ2U-462-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5NRLg-6LJ-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <5NRUR-6Yo-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <5NUSF-30Z-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-08  1:10         ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-08 11:35           ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 14:55           ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-07 17:40 David Howells
2006-03-07 10:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 18:30 ` David Howells
2006-03-07 11:13   ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 18:46   ` Jesse Barnes
2006-03-07 19:23   ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-07 11:57     ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 20:01       ` Jesse Barnes
2006-03-07 21:14       ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-07 21:24         ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-08  0:36           ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08  0:35       ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 19:24   ` David Howells
2006-03-07 19:46     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 18:54   ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-07 19:06     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-07 19:15       ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-09 11:26         ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-07 19:33     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 20:09 ` David Howells
2006-03-08  0:32   ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08  8:25   ` Duncan Sands
2006-03-08 22:06     ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 22:24       ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08 22:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 22:42       ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08  2:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08  3:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08  3:30   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08  7:41   ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 12:34   ` David Howells
2006-03-08 16:40     ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-08 13:19 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 21:49   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 22:05     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-10  0:49   ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-03-08 16:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-08 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 17:35 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 17:46   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 17:59     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 20:16 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 22:01   ` Alan Cox
2006-03-09 11:41   ` David Howells
2006-03-09 12:28     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-09 13:02     ` David Howells
2006-03-09 16:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 17:39     ` David Howells
2006-03-09 17:54       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 17:56         ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=440E2428.5030303@drugphish.ch \
    --to=ratz@drugphish.ch \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome