mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers
Date: 08 Mar 2006 15:55:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73fyltf0kz.fsf@verdi.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440E2EE8.10708@shaw.ca>

Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> writes:

> Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 22:24 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>> But on most arches those accesses do indeed seem to happen in-order.  On
> >>> i386 and x86_64, it's a natural consequence of program store ordering.
> >> Not true for reads on x86.
> > You must have a strange kernel Andi. Mine marks them as volatile
> > unsigned char * references.
> 
> Well, that and the fact that IO memory should be mapped as uncacheable
> in the MTRRs should ensure that readl and writel won't be reordered on
> i386 and x86_64.. except in the case where CONFIG_UNORDERED_IO is
> enabled on x86_64 which can reorder writes since it uses nontemporal
> stores..

CONFIG_UNORDERED_IO is a failed experiment. I just removed it.

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-08 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5NONi-2hp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <5NOtZ-1FO-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5NPgs-2Rw-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <5NPq4-34a-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-08  0:22       ` Robert Hancock
     [not found] ` <5NQ2U-462-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5NRLg-6LJ-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <5NRUR-6Yo-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <5NUSF-30Z-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-08  1:10         ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-08 11:35           ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 14:55           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-03-07 23:17 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-08  0:15 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08  0:24 ` Roberto Nibali
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-07 17:40 David Howells
2006-03-07 10:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 18:30 ` David Howells
2006-03-07 11:13   ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 18:46   ` Jesse Barnes
2006-03-07 19:23   ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-07 11:57     ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 20:01       ` Jesse Barnes
2006-03-07 21:14       ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-07 21:24         ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-08  0:36           ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08  0:35       ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 19:24   ` David Howells
2006-03-07 19:46     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 18:54   ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-07 19:06     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-07 19:15       ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-09 11:26         ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-07 19:33     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 20:09 ` David Howells
2006-03-08  0:32   ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08  8:25   ` Duncan Sands
2006-03-08 22:06     ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 22:24       ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08 22:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 22:42       ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08  2:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08  3:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08  3:30   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08  7:41   ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 12:34   ` David Howells
2006-03-08 16:40     ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-08 13:19 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 21:49   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 22:05     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-10  0:49   ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-03-08 16:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-08 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 17:35 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 17:46   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 17:59     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 20:16 ` David Howells
2006-03-08 22:01   ` Alan Cox
2006-03-09 11:41   ` David Howells
2006-03-09 12:28     ` Alan Cox
2006-03-09 13:02     ` David Howells
2006-03-09 16:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 17:39     ` David Howells
2006-03-09 17:54       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 17:56         ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p73fyltf0kz.fsf@verdi.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome