* [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it
@ 2026-09-24 20:59 Tanmay Shah
2026-09-27 8:55 ` Francesco Valla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tanmay Shah @ 2026-09-24 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andersson, mathieu.poirier, ohad
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, Tanmay Shah
The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The
driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do
corresponding cleanup.
Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation")
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
+ virtio_reset_device(vdev);
+
unregister_virtio_device(vdev);
return 0;
}
base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it 2026-09-24 20:59 [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it Tanmay Shah @ 2026-09-27 8:55 ` Francesco Valla 2026-09-30 21:59 ` Shah, Tanmay 2026-10-01 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Francesco Valla @ 2026-09-27 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tanmay Shah Cc: andersson, mathieu.poirier, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel Hi Tanmay, On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote: > The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The > driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do > corresponding cleanup. > Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls virtio_reset_device()? > Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation") > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data) > { > struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); > > + virtio_reset_device(vdev); > + > unregister_virtio_device(vdev); > return 0; > } > > base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d > -- > 2.43.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it 2026-09-27 8:55 ` Francesco Valla @ 2026-09-30 21:59 ` Shah, Tanmay 2026-10-01 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Shah, Tanmay @ 2026-09-30 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Francesco Valla, Tanmay Shah Cc: andersson, mathieu.poirier, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel On 9/27/2026 3:55 AM, Francesco Valla wrote: > Hi Tanmay, > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote: >> The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The >> driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do >> corresponding cleanup. >> > > Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls > virtio_reset_device()? > Hello Francesco, Thanks for your reviews. I will look into it. Tanmay >> Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation") >> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com> >> --- >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >> index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >> @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data) >> { >> struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); >> >> + virtio_reset_device(vdev); >> + >> unregister_virtio_device(vdev); >> return 0; >> } >> >> base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d >> -- >> 2.43.0 >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it 2026-09-27 8:55 ` Francesco Valla 2026-09-30 21:59 ` Shah, Tanmay @ 2026-10-01 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier 2026-10-01 17:18 ` Shah, Tanmay 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2026-10-01 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Francesco Valla Cc: Tanmay Shah, andersson, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Francesco Valla wrote: > Hi Tanmay, > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote: > > The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The > > driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do > > corresponding cleanup. > > > > Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls > virtio_reset_device()? Function rproc_remove_virtio_dev() calls unregister_virtio_device(), which calls device_unregister(), which should end up calling virtio_bus.remove(), in this case virtio_dev_remove(). virtio_dev_remove() calls drv->remove(). If we take the RPMSG driver, rpmsg_remove() calls virtio_reset_device(), so explicitly resetting devices as part of rproc_remove_virtio_dev() is not needed. Tanmay, have you observed a scenario where the above isn't working? > > > Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation") > > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com> > > --- > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > > index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644 > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > > @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data) > > { > > struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); > > > > + virtio_reset_device(vdev); > > + > > unregister_virtio_device(vdev); > > return 0; > > } > > > > base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d > > -- > > 2.43.0 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it 2026-10-01 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier @ 2026-10-01 17:18 ` Shah, Tanmay 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Shah, Tanmay @ 2026-10-01 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Poirier, Francesco Valla Cc: Tanmay Shah, andersson, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel On 10/1/2026 11:50 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Francesco Valla wrote: >> Hi Tanmay, >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote: >>> The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The >>> driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do >>> corresponding cleanup. >>> >> >> Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls >> virtio_reset_device()? > > Function rproc_remove_virtio_dev() calls unregister_virtio_device(), which calls > device_unregister(), which should end up calling virtio_bus.remove(), in this > case virtio_dev_remove(). virtio_dev_remove() calls drv->remove(). If we take > the RPMSG driver, rpmsg_remove() calls virtio_reset_device(), so explicitly > resetting devices as part of rproc_remove_virtio_dev() is not needed. > > Tanmay, have you observed a scenario where the above isn't working? > Nope. I didn't send the patch based on any practical scenario. This is an old patch that I had used at the time to issue reset on shutdown. I missed that the driver is already doing it. Probably my assessment was incorrect at the time. I think we should remove this patch. >> >>> Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation") >>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >>> index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >>> @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data) >>> { >>> struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); >>> >>> + virtio_reset_device(vdev); >>> + >>> unregister_virtio_device(vdev); >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d >>> -- >>> 2.43.0 >>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-01 17:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-24 20:59 [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it Tanmay Shah 2026-09-27 8:55 ` Francesco Valla 2026-09-30 21:59 ` Shah, Tanmay 2026-10-01 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier 2026-10-01 17:18 ` Shah, Tanmay
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®