mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it
@ 2026-09-24 20:59 Tanmay Shah
  2026-09-27  8:55 ` Francesco Valla
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tanmay Shah @ 2026-09-24 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andersson, mathieu.poirier, ohad
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, Tanmay Shah

The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The
driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do
corresponding cleanup.

Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation")
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
 {
 	struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
 
+	virtio_reset_device(vdev);
+
 	unregister_virtio_device(vdev);
 	return 0;
 }

base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it
  2026-09-24 20:59 [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it Tanmay Shah
@ 2026-09-27  8:55 ` Francesco Valla
  2026-09-30 21:59   ` Shah, Tanmay
  2026-10-01 16:50   ` Mathieu Poirier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Francesco Valla @ 2026-09-27  8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tanmay Shah
  Cc: andersson, mathieu.poirier, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel

Hi Tanmay,

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The
> driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do
> corresponding cleanup.
> 

Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls
virtio_reset_device()?

> Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation")
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
>  
> +	virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> +
>  	unregister_virtio_device(vdev);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it
  2026-09-27  8:55 ` Francesco Valla
@ 2026-09-30 21:59   ` Shah, Tanmay
  2026-10-01 16:50   ` Mathieu Poirier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shah, Tanmay @ 2026-09-30 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Francesco Valla, Tanmay Shah
  Cc: andersson, mathieu.poirier, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel



On 9/27/2026 3:55 AM, Francesco Valla wrote:
> Hi Tanmay,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The
>> driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do
>> corresponding cleanup.
>>
> 
> Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls
> virtio_reset_device()?
> 

Hello Francesco,

Thanks for your reviews. I will look into it.

Tanmay

>> Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation")
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>> index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>> @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
>>  {
>>  	struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
>>  
>> +	virtio_reset_device(vdev);
>> +
>>  	unregister_virtio_device(vdev);
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it
  2026-09-27  8:55 ` Francesco Valla
  2026-09-30 21:59   ` Shah, Tanmay
@ 2026-10-01 16:50   ` Mathieu Poirier
  2026-10-01 17:18     ` Shah, Tanmay
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2026-10-01 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Francesco Valla
  Cc: Tanmay Shah, andersson, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel

On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Francesco Valla wrote:
> Hi Tanmay,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The
> > driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do
> > corresponding cleanup.
> > 
> 
> Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls
> virtio_reset_device()?

Function rproc_remove_virtio_dev() calls unregister_virtio_device(), which calls
device_unregister(), which should end up calling virtio_bus.remove(), in this
case virtio_dev_remove().  virtio_dev_remove() calls drv->remove().  If we take
the RPMSG driver, rpmsg_remove() calls virtio_reset_device(), so explicitly
resetting devices as part of rproc_remove_virtio_dev() is not needed.  

Tanmay, have you observed a scenario where the above isn't working?

> 
> > Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation")
> > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >  {
> >  	struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
> >  
> > +	virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> > +
> >  	unregister_virtio_device(vdev);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it
  2026-10-01 16:50   ` Mathieu Poirier
@ 2026-10-01 17:18     ` Shah, Tanmay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shah, Tanmay @ 2026-10-01 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mathieu Poirier, Francesco Valla
  Cc: Tanmay Shah, andersson, ohad, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel



On 10/1/2026 11:50 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Francesco Valla wrote:
>> Hi Tanmay,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>>> The virtio device is removed when the remoteproc device is removed. The
>>> driver should issue reset on the virtio device so the remote can do
>>> corresponding cleanup.
>>>
>>
>> Shouldn't be the driver, and not the transport, the one that calls
>> virtio_reset_device()?
> 
> Function rproc_remove_virtio_dev() calls unregister_virtio_device(), which calls
> device_unregister(), which should end up calling virtio_bus.remove(), in this
> case virtio_dev_remove().  virtio_dev_remove() calls drv->remove().  If we take
> the RPMSG driver, rpmsg_remove() calls virtio_reset_device(), so explicitly
> resetting devices as part of rproc_remove_virtio_dev() is not needed.  
> 
> Tanmay, have you observed a scenario where the above isn't working?
>  

Nope. I didn't send the patch based on any practical scenario. This is
an old patch that I had used at the time to issue reset on shutdown. I
missed that the driver is already doing it. Probably my assessment was
incorrect at the time. I think we should remove this patch.

>>
>>> Fixes: 7a186941626d ("remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation")
>>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>> index d5e9ff045a28..1cb0ee0ea656 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>> @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int rproc_remove_virtio_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
>>>  
>>> +	virtio_reset_device(vdev);
>>> +
>>>  	unregister_virtio_device(vdev);
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> base-commit: 5f639b3018c0026a5341949724b4b921cf3a3d5d
>>> -- 
>>> 2.43.0
>>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-01 17:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-24 20:59 [PATCH] remoteproc: remoteproc_virtio: reset vdev before removing it Tanmay Shah
2026-09-27  8:55 ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-30 21:59   ` Shah, Tanmay
2026-10-01 16:50   ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-10-01 17:18     ` Shah, Tanmay

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®