From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/14] x86/fault: Split the OOPS code out from no_context()
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 18:33:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <450f8d8eabafb83a5df349108c8e5ea83a2f939d.1612924255.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1612924255.git.luto@kernel.org>
Not all callers of no_context() want to run exception fixups.
Separate the OOPS code out from the fixup code in no_context().
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 3fe2f4800b69..8b8bd0a4f4b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -654,53 +654,20 @@ static void set_signal_archinfo(unsigned long address,
}
static noinline void
-no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
- unsigned long address, int signal, int si_code)
+page_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
+ unsigned long address)
{
- struct task_struct *tsk = current;
unsigned long flags;
int sig;
if (user_mode(regs)) {
/*
- * This is an implicit supervisor-mode access from user
- * mode. Bypass all the kernel-mode recovery code and just
- * OOPS.
+ * Implicit kernel access from user mode? Skip the stack
+ * overflow and EFI special cases.
*/
goto oops;
}
- /* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
- if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_PF, error_code, address)) {
- /*
- * Any interrupt that takes a fault gets the fixup. This makes
- * the below recursive fault logic only apply to a faults from
- * task context.
- */
- if (in_interrupt())
- return;
-
- /*
- * Per the above we're !in_interrupt(), aka. task context.
- *
- * In this case we need to make sure we're not recursively
- * faulting through the emulate_vsyscall() logic.
- */
- if (current->thread.sig_on_uaccess_err && signal) {
- sanitize_error_code(address, &error_code);
-
- set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);
-
- /* XXX: hwpoison faults will set the wrong code. */
- force_sig_fault(signal, si_code, (void __user *)address);
- }
-
- /*
- * Barring that, we can do the fixup and be happy.
- */
- return;
- }
-
#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
/*
* Stack overflow? During boot, we can fault near the initial
@@ -708,8 +675,8 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
* that we're in vmalloc space to avoid this.
*/
if (is_vmalloc_addr((void *)address) &&
- (((unsigned long)tsk->stack - 1 - address < PAGE_SIZE) ||
- address - ((unsigned long)tsk->stack + THREAD_SIZE) < PAGE_SIZE)) {
+ (((unsigned long)current->stack - 1 - address < PAGE_SIZE) ||
+ address - ((unsigned long)current->stack + THREAD_SIZE) < PAGE_SIZE)) {
unsigned long stack = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(DF) - sizeof(void *);
/*
* We're likely to be running with very little stack space
@@ -732,20 +699,6 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
}
#endif
- /*
- * 32-bit:
- *
- * Valid to do another page fault here, because if this fault
- * had been triggered by is_prefetch fixup_exception would have
- * handled it.
- *
- * 64-bit:
- *
- * Hall of shame of CPU/BIOS bugs.
- */
- if (is_prefetch(regs, error_code, address))
- return;
-
/*
* Buggy firmware could access regions which might page fault, try to
* recover from such faults.
@@ -762,7 +715,7 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
show_fault_oops(regs, error_code, address);
- if (task_stack_end_corrupted(tsk))
+ if (task_stack_end_corrupted(current))
printk(KERN_EMERG "Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted\n");
sig = SIGKILL;
@@ -775,6 +728,61 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
oops_end(flags, regs, sig);
}
+static noinline void
+no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
+ unsigned long address, int signal, int si_code)
+{
+ if (user_mode(regs)) {
+ /*
+ * This is an implicit supervisor-mode access from user
+ * mode. Bypass all the kernel-mode recovery code and just
+ * OOPS.
+ */
+ goto oops;
+ }
+
+ /* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
+ if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_PF, error_code, address)) {
+ /*
+ * Any interrupt that takes a fault gets the fixup. This makes
+ * the below recursive fault logic only apply to a faults from
+ * task context.
+ */
+ if (in_interrupt())
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Per the above we're !in_interrupt(), aka. task context.
+ *
+ * In this case we need to make sure we're not recursively
+ * faulting through the emulate_vsyscall() logic.
+ */
+ if (current->thread.sig_on_uaccess_err && signal) {
+ sanitize_error_code(address, &error_code);
+
+ set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);
+
+ /* XXX: hwpoison faults will set the wrong code. */
+ force_sig_fault(signal, si_code, (void __user *)address);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Barring that, we can do the fixup and be happy.
+ */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * AMD erratum #91 manifests as a spurious page fault on a PREFETCH
+ * instruction.
+ */
+ if (is_prefetch(regs, error_code, address))
+ return;
+
+oops:
+ page_fault_oops(regs, error_code, address);
+}
+
/*
* Print out info about fatal segfaults, if the show_unhandled_signals
* sysctl is set:
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 2:33 [PATCH v2 00/14] x86/fault: #PF improvements, mostly related to USER bit Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] x86/fault: Fix AMD erratum #91 errata fixup for user code Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] x86/fault: Skip the AMD erratum #91 workaround on unaffected CPUs Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] x86/fault: Fold mm_fault_error() into do_user_addr_fault() Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] x86/fault/32: Move is_f00f_bug() to do_kern_addr_fault() Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] x86/fault: Document the locking in the fault_signal_pending() path Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] x86/fault: Correct a few user vs kernel checks wrt WRUSS Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] x86/fault: Improve kernel-executing-user-memory handling Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] x86/fault: Skip erratum #93 workaround on new CPUs Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 6:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 13:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-10 16:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] x86/fault: Split the OOPS code out from no_context() tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] x86/fault: Bypass no_context() for implicit kernel faults from usermode Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] x86/fault: Rename no_context() to kernelmode_fixup_or_oops() Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] x86/fault: Don't look for extable entries for SMEP violations Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] x86/fault: Don't run fixups for SMAP violations Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] x86/fault, x86/efi: Fix and rename efi_recover_from_page_fault() Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-10 17:45 ` [tip: x86/mm] x86/{fault,efi}: " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-11 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] x86/fault, x86/efi: " Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-10 13:57 ` [RFC][PATCH] kprobes: Remove kprobe::fault_handler Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-10 19:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-10 19:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=450f8d8eabafb83a5df349108c8e5ea83a2f939d.1612924255.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®