From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 11:14:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45c09edb-138c-4d78-a6aa-c50dfa73cead@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826082641.2007658-8-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
On 8/26/26 16:26, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> GC can operate on a 4K block that is cached inside a large folio.
> The data lookup helpers therefore need to test and update uptodate
> state for the addressed subpage instead of rejecting large folios or
> treating the whole folio as the target block.
>
> Let f2fs_get_read_data_folio(), f2fs_find_data_folio(), and
> f2fs_get_lock_data_folio() to use subpage uptodate state. Submit
> single-block reads at the requested folio offset and zero only the
> addressed 4K range for NEW_ADDR.
>
> Also update `move_data_page` to mark, clear, and restore dirty
> state for the target subpage, and submit write I/O with the subpage
> offset recorded in f2fs_io_info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 ++--
> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 608d8ea8e607..0e54b1e25893 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1241,19 +1241,31 @@ static struct bio *f2fs_grab_read_bio(struct inode *inode,
>
> /* This can handle encryption stuffs */
> static void f2fs_submit_page_read(struct inode *inode, struct fsverity_info *vi,
> - struct folio *folio, block_t blkaddr,
> - blk_opf_t op_flags, bool for_write)
> + struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index,
> + block_t blkaddr, blk_opf_t op_flags,
> + bool for_write)
> {
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> struct bio *bio;
> + size_t offset = 0;
>
> - bio = f2fs_grab_read_bio(inode, vi, blkaddr, 1, op_flags, folio->index,
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + offset = offset_in_folio(folio, (loff_t)index << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + ffs->read_pages_pending++;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + }
How about wrapping this to a function, and use it to clean up the codes.
f2fs_update_read_folio_pending(, pages)
> +
> + bio = f2fs_grab_read_bio(inode, vi, blkaddr, 1, op_flags, index,
> for_write);
>
> /* wait for GCed page writeback via META_MAPPING */
> f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(inode, blkaddr);
>
> - if (!bio_add_folio(bio, folio, PAGE_SIZE, 0))
> + if (!bio_add_folio(bio, folio, PAGE_SIZE, offset))
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
>
> inc_page_count(sbi, F2FS_RD_DATA);
> @@ -1399,21 +1411,13 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_read_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> struct dnode_of_data dn;
> struct folio *folio;
> int err;
> -retry:
> +
> folio = f2fs_grab_cache_folio(mapping, index, for_write);
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
> return folio;
>
> - if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> - pgoff_t folio_index = mapping_align_index(mapping, index);
> - unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> -
> - f2fs_folio_put(folio, true);
> - invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping, folio_index,
> - folio_index + nr_pages - 1);
> - f2fs_schedule_timeout(DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> - goto retry;
> - }
> + if (folio_test_large(folio))
> + f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
>
> if (f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, index,
> &dn.data_blkaddr)) {
> @@ -1448,7 +1452,7 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_read_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> goto put_err;
> }
> got_it:
> - if (folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> + if (f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index)) {
> folio_unlock(folio);
> return folio;
> }
> @@ -1461,15 +1465,17 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_read_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> * f2fs_init_inode_metadata.
> */
> if (dn.data_blkaddr == NEW_ADDR) {
> - folio_zero_segment(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
> - if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> - folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + size_t offset = offset_in_folio(folio,
> + (loff_t)index << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> + folio_zero_segment(folio, offset, offset + PAGE_SIZE);
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio, offset, PAGE_SIZE);
> folio_unlock(folio);
> return folio;
> }
>
> - f2fs_submit_page_read(inode, f2fs_need_verity(inode, folio->index),
> - folio, dn.data_blkaddr, op_flags, for_write);
> + f2fs_submit_page_read(inode, f2fs_need_verity(inode, index),
> + folio, index, dn.data_blkaddr, op_flags, for_write);
> return folio;
>
> put_err:
> @@ -1486,7 +1492,7 @@ struct folio *f2fs_find_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> folio = f2fs_filemap_get_folio(mapping, index, FGP_ACCESSED, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
> goto read;
> - if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> + if (f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))
> return folio;
> f2fs_folio_put(folio, false);
>
> @@ -1495,11 +1501,11 @@ struct folio *f2fs_find_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
> return folio;
>
> - if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> + if (f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))
> return folio;
>
> folio_wait_locked(folio);
> - if (unlikely(!folio_test_uptodate(folio))) {
> + if (unlikely(!f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))) {
> f2fs_folio_put(folio, false);
> return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> }
> @@ -1523,7 +1529,8 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_lock_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>
> /* wait for read completion */
> folio_lock(folio);
> - if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping || !folio_test_uptodate(folio))) {
> + if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping ||
> + !f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))) {
> f2fs_folio_put(folio, true);
> return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> }
> @@ -2681,6 +2688,23 @@ static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> }
>
> +bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_dirty(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + unsigned int idx, nr_subpages;
> +
> + if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> + return folio_test_dirty(folio);
> +
> + if (!folio_contains(folio, index))
> + return false;
Can we change this to a sanity check?
> +
> + ffs = folio->private;
> + nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> + idx = index - folio->index;
> + return test_bit(nr_subpages + idx, ffs->state);
> +}
> +
> void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> size_t offset, size_t len)
> {
> @@ -2719,18 +2743,30 @@ static bool __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> 2 * nr_subpages;
> }
>
> -void f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len)
> +/**
> + * f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty - clear the dirty bits of a folio subrange
> + * @folio: the large folio
> + * @offset: start byte offset within the folio
> + * @len: byte length of the subrange
> + *
> + * Clear the dirty bits of the 4K subpages covered by [offset, offset + len),
> + * and return whether the folio still has any dirty subpage left.
> + */
> +bool f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> + size_t len)
> {
> struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> unsigned long flags;
> + bool dirty;
>
> if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> - return;
> + return false;
>
> - ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + ffs = folio->private;
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> - __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, ffs, offset, len);
> + dirty = __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, ffs, offset, len);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + return dirty;
> }
>
> static unsigned int ffs_next_dirty_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> @@ -4853,7 +4889,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
> */
> f2fs_submit_page_read(inode,
> NULL, /* can't write to fsverity files */
> - folio, blkaddr, 0, true);
> + folio, index, blkaddr, 0, true);
>
> folio_lock(folio);
> if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping)) {
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 71e6d7e34c7b..0ffbe2bd04c8 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -4344,10 +4344,10 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct folio *folio, int *submitted,
> int compr_blocks, bool allow_balance);
> bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index);
> struct f2fs_folio_state *f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(struct folio *folio);
> +bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_dirty(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index);
> void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len);
> -bool f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty_and_test(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> - size_t len);
> -void f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len);
> +bool f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> + size_t len);
> void f2fs_write_failed(struct inode *inode, loff_t to);
> void f2fs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t length);
> bool f2fs_release_folio(struct folio *folio, gfp_t wait);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index 0c17038fcfd7..42e6dfcbf98d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -1504,12 +1504,19 @@ static int move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
> unsigned int segno, int off)
> {
> struct folio *folio;
> + size_t foff = 0;
> + bool large = false;
> int err = 0;
>
> folio = f2fs_get_lock_data_folio(inode, bidx, true);
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
> return PTR_ERR(folio);
>
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + large = true;
> + foff = offset_in_folio(folio, (loff_t)bidx << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + }
> +
> if (!check_valid_map(F2FS_I_SB(inode), segno, off)) {
> err = -ENOENT;
> goto out;
> @@ -1524,6 +1531,8 @@ static int move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
> err = -EAGAIN;
> goto out;
> }
> + if (large)
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE);
> folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> folio_set_f2fs_gcing(folio);
> } else {
> @@ -1536,32 +1545,49 @@ static int move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
> .op_flags = REQ_SYNC,
> .old_blkaddr = NULL_ADDR,
> .folio = folio,
> + .folio_offset = bidx - folio->index,
> + .folio_blkcnt = 1,
> .encrypted_page = NULL,
> .need_lock = LOCK_REQ,
> .io_type = FS_GC_DATA_IO,
> };
> - bool is_dirty = folio_test_dirty(folio);
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = NULL;
> + bool is_dirty = f2fs_ffs_test_blk_dirty(folio, bidx);
>
> retry:
> f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(folio, DATA, true, true);
>
> + if (large) {
> + ffs = folio->private;
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE);
> + }
> folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> if (folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio)) {
> inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> f2fs_remove_dirty_inode(inode);
> + if (large &&
> + f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE))
> + folio_mark_dirty(folio);
Why do we need to mark folio dirty again after clearing dirty?
Thanks,
> }
>
> + if (large)
> + atomic_inc(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> folio_set_f2fs_gcing(folio);
>
> err = f2fs_do_write_data_page(&fio);
> if (err) {
> folio_clear_f2fs_gcing(folio);
> + if (large)
> + atomic_dec(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> if (err == -ENOMEM) {
> memalloc_retry_wait(GFP_NOFS);
> goto retry;
> }
> - if (is_dirty)
> + if (is_dirty) {
> + if (large)
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE);
> folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> + }
> }
> }
> out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 8:26 [PATCH 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 6:57 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 20:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04 3:44 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 7:16 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 21:06 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 8:56 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 21:13 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31 3:04 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 9:24 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 11:17 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 22:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04 4:04 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04 4:07 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 12:36 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-28 17:18 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31 3:14 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31 4:21 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31 7:46 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31 7:56 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:44 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31 8:31 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:52 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31 8:46 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45c09edb-138c-4d78-a6aa-c50dfa73cead@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
--cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
--cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
--cc=nzzhao@126.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
--cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®