From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: david@lang.hm, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:27:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A8E78D.1040809@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707261113360.3442@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, david@lang.hm wrote:
>> how about the fact that Linus found the problem becouse his system didn't work
>> right?
>
> No, it works, it just forces me to use a configuration that I'm not
> personally interested in on that particular machine.
>
> I tend to like using minimal kernels. I don't use modules on most of my
> machines, and I actually look over my config. Maybe I'm odd. But I think
> it's a good thing to let people decide what they want (and what they do
> _not_ want) in their kernels.
>
> I think forcing people to use CPU_HOTPLUG is a mistake. There's a reason
> that existed as a config option. The ACPI changes basically mean that the
> whole CPU_HOTPLUG config option is totally pointless, because everybody is
> forced to have it.
Indeed -- forced to have a feature that is applicable in reality to
0.00000001% of the user population, I'd wager :)
I read and hone my .config to utter minimalist perfection too :) So
count my vote here too, for -not- wanting CPU_HOTPLUG dead code in my
kernel.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-26 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-25 16:38 Len Brown
2007-07-25 18:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-25 22:51 ` Len Brown
2007-07-26 2:20 ` david
2007-07-26 4:26 ` Len Brown
2007-07-26 5:00 ` david
2007-07-26 6:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26 17:45 ` Len Brown
2007-07-26 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26 18:02 ` david
2007-07-26 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26 18:27 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-07-26 18:18 ` Len Brown
2007-07-26 19:17 ` CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-26 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-26 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-27 22:25 ` [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU Adrian Bunk
2007-07-27 22:47 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-27 23:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-28 8:42 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-30 21:18 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-28 14:44 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2007-07-27 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-28 4:52 ` [2.6 patch] SOFTWARE_SUSPEND: handle HOTPLUG_CPU automatically Adrian Bunk
2007-07-28 9:07 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-28 18:30 ` [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-28 7:30 ` CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1) Len Brown
2007-07-28 7:33 ` [PATCH] ACPI: restore CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP Len Brown
2007-07-28 16:25 ` CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1) Linus Torvalds
2007-07-28 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-28 18:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-28 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-29 10:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-29 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-29 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-29 20:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-29 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-29 21:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-29 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-29 21:30 ` Richard Hughes
2007-07-29 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-30 21:26 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-30 2:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-07-29 21:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-29 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 4:59 ` Len Brown
2007-07-31 9:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 9:16 ` [linux-pm] " Oliver Neukum
2007-07-31 10:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-30 0:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and " Linus Torvalds
2007-07-30 7:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 3:54 ` Len Brown
2007-07-31 3:54 ` [PATCH] create CONFIG_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE Len Brown
2007-07-31 6:38 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-03 19:23 ` Len Brown
2007-08-05 18:36 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-01 3:27 ` [PATCH] ACPI: delete CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_SLEEP (again) Len Brown
2007-08-01 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 3:53 ` CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1) Len Brown
2007-07-31 4:09 ` david
2007-07-31 6:33 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-26 10:07 ` [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1 Gabriel C
2007-07-26 18:05 ` Len Brown
2007-07-26 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26 18:38 ` Gabriel C
2007-07-26 18:53 ` defconfig , ACPI=n compile error Gabriel C
2007-07-26 7:02 ` [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2007-07-27 6:26 ` Jan Dittmer
2007-07-27 16:25 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-07-27 23:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-07-28 7:58 ` Jan Dittmer
2007-08-01 1:34 ` Yasha Okshtein
2007-07-25 20:40 Al Boldi
2007-07-26 4:07 ` Len Brown
2007-07-26 4:14 ` david
2007-07-26 5:07 ` Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A8E78D.1040809@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome