mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
	"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/29] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 21:10:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47769188-cbe4-4008-8046-b4ca7d9f805b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521225049.132551-25-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi Tony,

On 5/21/25 3:50 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Users may want to force either of the telemetry features on
> (in the case where they are disabled due to erratum) or off
> (in the case that a limited number of RMIDs for a telemetry
> feature reduces the number of monitor groups that can be
> created.)
> 
> Unlike other options that are tied to X86_FEATURE_* flags,
> these must be queried by name. Add a function to do that.
> 
> Add checks for users who forced either feature off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h        |  4 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c            | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c       |  6 ++++
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index d9fd26b95b34..4811bc812f0f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5988,7 +5988,7 @@
>  	rdt=		[HW,X86,RDT]
>  			Turn on/off individual RDT features. List is:
>  			cmt, mbmtotal, mbmlocal, l3cat, l3cdp, l2cat, l2cdp,
> -			mba, smba, bmec.
> +			mba, smba, bmec, energy, perf.
>  			E.g. to turn on cmt and turn off mba use:
>  				rdt=cmt,!mba
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 42da0a222c7c..524f3c183900 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ void __init intel_rdt_mbm_apply_quirk(void);
>  
>  void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r);
>  
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_enabled(char *option);
> +
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_disabled(char *option);
> +
>  bool intel_aet_get_events(void);
>  void __exit intel_aet_exit(void);
>  int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, int rmid, enum resctrl_event_id evtid, u64 *val);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index f07f5b58639a..b23309566500 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -797,6 +797,8 @@ enum {
>  	RDT_FLAG_MBA,
>  	RDT_FLAG_SMBA,
>  	RDT_FLAG_BMEC,
> +	RDT_FLAG_ENERGY,
> +	RDT_FLAG_PERF,
>  };
>  
>  #define RDT_OPT(idx, n, f)	\
> @@ -822,6 +824,8 @@ static struct rdt_options rdt_options[]  __ro_after_init = {
>  	RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_MBA,	    "mba",	X86_FEATURE_MBA),
>  	RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_SMBA,	    "smba",	X86_FEATURE_SMBA),
>  	RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_BMEC,	    "bmec",	X86_FEATURE_BMEC),
> +	RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_ENERGY,    "energy",	0),
> +	RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_PERF,	    "perf",	0),
>  };
>  #define NUM_RDT_OPTIONS ARRAY_SIZE(rdt_options)
>  
> @@ -871,6 +875,30 @@ bool rdt_cpu_has(int flag)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_enabled(char *name)
> +{
> +	struct rdt_options *o;
> +
> +	for (o = rdt_options; o < &rdt_options[NUM_RDT_OPTIONS]; o++) {
> +		if (!strcmp(name, o->name))
> +			return o->force_on;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_disabled(char *name)
> +{
> +	struct rdt_options *o;
> +
> +	for (o = rdt_options; o < &rdt_options[NUM_RDT_OPTIONS]; o++) {
> +		if (!strcmp(name, o->name))
> +			return o->force_off;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  bool resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(enum resctrl_event_id evt)
>  {
>  	if (!rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BMEC))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> index be52c9302a80..c1fc85dbf0d8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct pmt_event {
>  
>  /**
>   * struct event_group - All information about a group of telemetry events.
> + * @name:		Name for this group (used by boot rdt= option)
>   * @pfg:		Points to the aggregated telemetry space information
>   *			within the OOBMSM driver that contains data for all
>   *			telemetry regions.
> @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ struct pmt_event {
>   */
>  struct event_group {
>  	/* Data fields used by this code. */
> +	char				*name;
>  	struct pmt_feature_group	*pfg;
>  	struct mmio_info		**pkginfo;
>  
> @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ struct event_group {
>   * File: xml/CWF/OOBMSM/RMID-ENERGY/cwf_aggregator.xml
>   */
>  static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
> +	.name		= "energy",
>  	.guid		= 0x26696143,
>  	.mmio_size	= (576 * 2 + 3) * 8,
>  	.num_events	= 2,
> @@ -91,6 +94,7 @@ static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
>   * File: xml/CWF/OOBMSM/RMID-PERF/cwf_aggregator.xml
>   */
>  static struct event_group perf_0x26557651 = {
> +	.name		= "perf",
>  	.guid		= 0x26557651,
>  	.mmio_size	= (576 * 7 + 3) * 8,
>  	.num_events	= 7,
> @@ -247,6 +251,8 @@ static bool get_pmt_feature(enum pmt_feature_id feature)
>  	for (peg = &known_event_groups[0]; peg < &known_event_groups[NUM_KNOWN_GROUPS]; peg++) {
>  		for (int i = 0; i < p->count; i++) {
>  			if ((*peg)->guid == p->regions[i].guid) {
> +				if (rdt_is_option_force_disabled((*peg)->name))
> +					return false;

I do not see how this supports the "erratum" use case claimed in the changelog.

resctrl supports the "erratum" use case for hardware features and how it
works is that resctrl forces a feature off and those features can be forced on by
a user via the rdt= parameter. The changelog claims that this supports the same.

Consider the scenario when resctrl forces a feature off because of erratum,
for example, by doing something like __check_quirks_intel():

	if (/* test if quirk applies */)
		set_rdt_options(!perf);

The above will set "force_off" for the "perf" feature and no matter if the
user boots with "rdt=perf, the above rdt_is_option_force_disabled() will
return true since it does not check "force_on" that is set via kernel parameter.
Thus it is not possible for user to enable a feature that is forced off
because of erratum.

Note how rdt_cpu_has() deals with this:
		if (o->force_off)
			ret = false;
		if (o->force_on)
			ret = true;

rdt_cpu_has() deals with the "erratum" use case by first checking for "force_off"
that will capture the disable due to erratum, but then allows that to be changed
by checking "force_on" next and change the setting.

>  				ret = configure_events(*peg, p);
>  				if (!ret) {
>  					(*peg)->pfg = no_free_ptr(p);

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-04  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-21 22:50 [PATCH v5 00/29] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitor event descriptions Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:25   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-04 16:33     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04 18:24       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture event enabled checks Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] x86/resctrl: Remove 'rdt_mon_features' global variable Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:27   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-05-23  9:00   ` Peter Newman
2025-05-23 15:57     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04  3:29   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07  0:45   ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 21:59     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] x86/rectrl: Fake OOBMSM interface Tony Luck
2025-05-23 23:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-27 20:25     ` [PATCH v5 05/29 UPDATED] x86/resctrl: " Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-04 22:58     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04 23:40       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization out of domain_add_cpu_mon() Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] x86/resctrl: Change generic domain functions to use struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-05-22  0:01   ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
2025-05-22  0:15     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04  3:37   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07  0:52   ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 22:02     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:40   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:42   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:49   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-06 16:25     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-06 16:56       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-10 15:16         ` Dave Martin
2025-06-10 15:54           ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-12 16:19             ` Dave Martin
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:49   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] x86/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope core monitor Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] x86/resctrl: Count valid telemetry aggregators per package Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] x86/resctrl: Complete telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-06-04  4:05   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of Clearwater Forest events Tony Luck
2025-06-04  3:57   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07  0:57   ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 22:05     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] x86/resctrl: x86/resctrl: Read core telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-06-04  4:02   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-06-04  4:06   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07  0:54   ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 22:03     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-06-04  4:10   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-06-06 23:55   ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 21:52     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-06-04  4:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] fs/resctrl: Add file system mechanism for architecture info file Tony Luck
2025-06-04  4:15   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-06  0:09     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-06 16:26       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-06 17:30         ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-06 21:14           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-09 18:49             ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-09 22:39               ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-09 23:34                 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-10  0:30                   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-10 18:48                     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] x86/resctrl: Add info/PERF_PKG_MON/status file Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] x86/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
2025-05-28 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 00/29] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Reinette Chatre
2025-05-28 21:38   ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-28 22:21     ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-13 16:57 ` James Morse
2025-06-13 18:50   ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47769188-cbe4-4008-8046-b4ca7d9f805b@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®