From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/29] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 21:10:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47769188-cbe4-4008-8046-b4ca7d9f805b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521225049.132551-25-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 5/21/25 3:50 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Users may want to force either of the telemetry features on
> (in the case where they are disabled due to erratum) or off
> (in the case that a limited number of RMIDs for a telemetry
> feature reduces the number of monitor groups that can be
> created.)
>
> Unlike other options that are tied to X86_FEATURE_* flags,
> these must be queried by name. Add a function to do that.
>
> Add checks for users who forced either feature off.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 4 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 6 ++++
> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index d9fd26b95b34..4811bc812f0f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5988,7 +5988,7 @@
> rdt= [HW,X86,RDT]
> Turn on/off individual RDT features. List is:
> cmt, mbmtotal, mbmlocal, l3cat, l3cdp, l2cat, l2cdp,
> - mba, smba, bmec.
> + mba, smba, bmec, energy, perf.
> E.g. to turn on cmt and turn off mba use:
> rdt=cmt,!mba
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 42da0a222c7c..524f3c183900 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ void __init intel_rdt_mbm_apply_quirk(void);
>
> void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r);
>
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_enabled(char *option);
> +
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_disabled(char *option);
> +
> bool intel_aet_get_events(void);
> void __exit intel_aet_exit(void);
> int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, int rmid, enum resctrl_event_id evtid, u64 *val);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index f07f5b58639a..b23309566500 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -797,6 +797,8 @@ enum {
> RDT_FLAG_MBA,
> RDT_FLAG_SMBA,
> RDT_FLAG_BMEC,
> + RDT_FLAG_ENERGY,
> + RDT_FLAG_PERF,
> };
>
> #define RDT_OPT(idx, n, f) \
> @@ -822,6 +824,8 @@ static struct rdt_options rdt_options[] __ro_after_init = {
> RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_MBA, "mba", X86_FEATURE_MBA),
> RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_SMBA, "smba", X86_FEATURE_SMBA),
> RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_BMEC, "bmec", X86_FEATURE_BMEC),
> + RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_ENERGY, "energy", 0),
> + RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_PERF, "perf", 0),
> };
> #define NUM_RDT_OPTIONS ARRAY_SIZE(rdt_options)
>
> @@ -871,6 +875,30 @@ bool rdt_cpu_has(int flag)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_enabled(char *name)
> +{
> + struct rdt_options *o;
> +
> + for (o = rdt_options; o < &rdt_options[NUM_RDT_OPTIONS]; o++) {
> + if (!strcmp(name, o->name))
> + return o->force_on;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +bool rdt_is_option_force_disabled(char *name)
> +{
> + struct rdt_options *o;
> +
> + for (o = rdt_options; o < &rdt_options[NUM_RDT_OPTIONS]; o++) {
> + if (!strcmp(name, o->name))
> + return o->force_off;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> bool resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(enum resctrl_event_id evt)
> {
> if (!rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BMEC))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> index be52c9302a80..c1fc85dbf0d8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct pmt_event {
>
> /**
> * struct event_group - All information about a group of telemetry events.
> + * @name: Name for this group (used by boot rdt= option)
> * @pfg: Points to the aggregated telemetry space information
> * within the OOBMSM driver that contains data for all
> * telemetry regions.
> @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ struct pmt_event {
> */
> struct event_group {
> /* Data fields used by this code. */
> + char *name;
> struct pmt_feature_group *pfg;
> struct mmio_info **pkginfo;
>
> @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ struct event_group {
> * File: xml/CWF/OOBMSM/RMID-ENERGY/cwf_aggregator.xml
> */
> static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
> + .name = "energy",
> .guid = 0x26696143,
> .mmio_size = (576 * 2 + 3) * 8,
> .num_events = 2,
> @@ -91,6 +94,7 @@ static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
> * File: xml/CWF/OOBMSM/RMID-PERF/cwf_aggregator.xml
> */
> static struct event_group perf_0x26557651 = {
> + .name = "perf",
> .guid = 0x26557651,
> .mmio_size = (576 * 7 + 3) * 8,
> .num_events = 7,
> @@ -247,6 +251,8 @@ static bool get_pmt_feature(enum pmt_feature_id feature)
> for (peg = &known_event_groups[0]; peg < &known_event_groups[NUM_KNOWN_GROUPS]; peg++) {
> for (int i = 0; i < p->count; i++) {
> if ((*peg)->guid == p->regions[i].guid) {
> + if (rdt_is_option_force_disabled((*peg)->name))
> + return false;
I do not see how this supports the "erratum" use case claimed in the changelog.
resctrl supports the "erratum" use case for hardware features and how it
works is that resctrl forces a feature off and those features can be forced on by
a user via the rdt= parameter. The changelog claims that this supports the same.
Consider the scenario when resctrl forces a feature off because of erratum,
for example, by doing something like __check_quirks_intel():
if (/* test if quirk applies */)
set_rdt_options(!perf);
The above will set "force_off" for the "perf" feature and no matter if the
user boots with "rdt=perf, the above rdt_is_option_force_disabled() will
return true since it does not check "force_on" that is set via kernel parameter.
Thus it is not possible for user to enable a feature that is forced off
because of erratum.
Note how rdt_cpu_has() deals with this:
if (o->force_off)
ret = false;
if (o->force_on)
ret = true;
rdt_cpu_has() deals with the "erratum" use case by first checking for "force_off"
that will capture the disable due to erratum, but then allows that to be changed
by checking "force_on" next and change the setting.
> ret = configure_events(*peg, p);
> if (!ret) {
> (*peg)->pfg = no_free_ptr(p);
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-21 22:50 [PATCH v5 00/29] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitor event descriptions Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-04 16:33 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04 18:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture event enabled checks Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] x86/resctrl: Remove 'rdt_mon_features' global variable Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-05-23 9:00 ` Peter Newman
2025-05-23 15:57 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04 3:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07 0:45 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 21:59 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] x86/rectrl: Fake OOBMSM interface Tony Luck
2025-05-23 23:38 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-27 20:25 ` [PATCH v5 05/29 UPDATED] x86/resctrl: " Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-04 22:58 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04 23:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization out of domain_add_cpu_mon() Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] x86/resctrl: Change generic domain functions to use struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-05-22 0:01 ` Keshavamurthy, Anil S
2025-05-22 0:15 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-04 3:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07 0:52 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 22:02 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-06 16:25 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-06 16:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-10 15:16 ` Dave Martin
2025-06-10 15:54 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-12 16:19 ` Dave Martin
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] x86/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope core monitor Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] x86/resctrl: Count valid telemetry aggregators per package Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] x86/resctrl: Complete telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-06-04 4:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of Clearwater Forest events Tony Luck
2025-06-04 3:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07 0:57 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 22:05 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] x86/resctrl: x86/resctrl: Read core telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-06-04 4:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-06-04 4:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-07 0:54 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 22:03 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-06-04 4:10 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-06-06 23:55 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-08 21:52 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-06-04 4:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] x86,fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] fs/resctrl: Add file system mechanism for architecture info file Tony Luck
2025-06-04 4:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-06 0:09 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-06 16:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-06 17:30 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-06 21:14 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-09 18:49 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-09 22:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-09 23:34 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-10 0:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-10 18:48 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] x86/resctrl: Add info/PERF_PKG_MON/status file Tony Luck
2025-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] x86/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
2025-05-28 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 00/29] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Reinette Chatre
2025-05-28 21:38 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-28 22:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-13 16:57 ` James Morse
2025-06-13 18:50 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47769188-cbe4-4008-8046-b4ca7d9f805b@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®