From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
"Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH update] firewire: fix "kobject_add failed for fw* with -EEXIST"
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:16:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479E29F2.7020307@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801281148.54017.jwilson@redhat.com>
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Looks straight-forward enough, and I'll give these a spin shortly and see if I
> can reproduce the situation I was hitting with my raid array...
As far as the naming of devices is concerned, the bug and the necessary
fix are entirely obvious.
But the interaction with userspace processes opening /dev/fwX while the
respective node is being shut down gave me headaches. I am still not
entirely sure if I got it right in the patch update, i.e. if it is free
from deadlocks. fw_device_shutdown() and fw_device_op_open() can be
entered at the same time. Would device_unregister() have to acquire a
driver core lock which open() already took? If yes, device_unregister()
would be blocked on this lock while fw_device_op_open() is blocked on
idr_rwsem.
So why did I move device_unregister() into the idr_rwsem protected
section in the first place? That's because I wanted to guarantee that
fw_device_op_open() wouldn't look up a fw_device which is just in the
process of being unregistered. But maybe we don't even need this guarantee.
It would all be so easy if I knew how the driver core works. :-/
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- ---= ===--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-27 0:05 [PATCH] " Stefan Richter
2008-01-27 17:20 ` [PATCH update] " Stefan Richter
2008-01-27 17:21 ` [PATCH] firewire: fail open() quickly if the node doesn't exist anymore Stefan Richter
2008-01-28 22:32 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-28 23:50 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-28 16:48 ` [PATCH update] firewire: fix "kobject_add failed for fw* with -EEXIST" Jarod Wilson
2008-01-28 18:54 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-28 22:24 ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-28 19:16 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-01-28 23:31 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-02 14:01 ` [PATCH update 2] " Stefan Richter
2008-01-28 22:30 ` [PATCH update] " Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479E29F2.7020307@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=jwilson@redhat.com \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®