* linux-firmware patches
@ 2008-10-07 18:36 Dave
2008-10-08 10:29 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave @ 2008-10-07 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dwmw2, linux-kernel
Should patches to add firmware to the linux-firmware tree (and not the main kernel) be sent to linux-kernel, or somewhere else? It wasn't mentioned in the [ANNOUNCE]*, and I haven't been able to find an example on list.
Just wanted to check before posting an 80k patch consisting of non-GPL binary files.
Thanks,
Dave.
* <http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/15/241>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-firmware patches
2008-10-07 18:36 linux-firmware patches Dave
@ 2008-10-08 10:29 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2008-10-08 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 19:36 +0100, Dave wrote:
> Should patches to add firmware to the linux-firmware tree (and not the
> main kernel) be sent to linux-kernel, or somewhere else? It wasn't
> mentioned in the [ANNOUNCE]*, and I haven't been able to find an
> example on list.
>
> Just wanted to check before posting an 80k patch consisting of non-GPL
> binary files.
Patches with binary files are going to be hard -- probably best just to
commit to a git tree and ask me to pull. Or mail the files separately,
with the changes to the WHENCE file as a separate patch.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-08 10:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-07 18:36 linux-firmware patches Dave
2008-10-08 10:29 ` David Woodhouse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome