[PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral

[PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral

[Francesco Dolcini]

From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>

The message is also stored as the probe deferral reason, where it wrongly
claims the 'enable'/'select' property is missing while it is the GPIO
provider that has not probed (yet?).

Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c
index 9099c57e2715..918b2c6444ee 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int gpio_clk_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, gpio_name, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
 	if (IS_ERR(gpiod))
 		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(gpiod),
-				     "Can't get '%s' named GPIO property\n", gpio_name);
+				     "Can't get '%s' GPIO\n", gpio_name);
 
 	if (is_mux)
 		hw = clk_hw_register_gpio_mux(dev, gpiod);
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2026, 13:49:06 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Francesco Dolcini:
> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
> 
> The message is also stored as the probe deferral reason, where it wrongly
> claims the 'enable'/'select' property is missing while it is the GPIO
> provider that has not probed (yet?).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>