mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: "Milton Miller" <miltonm@bga.com>
Cc: <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>, <mingo@elte.hu>,
	<jaxboe@fusionio.com>, <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@gmx.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	"Anton Blanchard" <anton@samba.org>,
	"Dimitri Sivanich" <sivanich@sgi.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:52:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D807A430200007800036BDF@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <smp-ipi-mask-clear-race-v3@mdm.bga.com>

>>> On 15.03.11 at 20:27, Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com> wrote:
> Mike Galbraith reported finding a lockup ("perma-spin bug") where the
> cpumask passed to smp_call_function_many was cleared by other cpu(s)
> while a cpu was preparing its call_data block, resulting in no cpu to
> clear the last ref and unlock the block.
> 
> Having cpus clear their bit asynchronously could be useful on a mask of
> cpus that might have a translation context, or cpus that need a push to
> complete an rcu window.
> 
> Instead of adding a BUG_ON and requiring yet another cpumask copy, just
> detect the race and handle it.
> 
> Note: arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask must still handle an empty
> cpumask because the data block is globally visible before the that
> arch callback is made.  And (obviously) there are no guarantees to
> which cpus are notified if the mask is changed during the call;
> only cpus that were online and had their mask bit set during the
> whole call are guaranteed to be called.
> 
> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Reported-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>

Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>

> ---
> v3: try to clarify which mask in comment
> v2: rediff for v2 of call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race
> 
> The arch code not expecting the race to empty the mask is the cause
> of https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23042 that Andrew pointed
> out.
> 
> 
> Index: common/kernel/smp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- common.orig/kernel/smp.c	2011-03-15 05:22:26.000000000 -0500
> +++ common/kernel/smp.c	2011-03-15 06:22:26.000000000 -0500
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
>  {
>  	struct call_function_data *data;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	int cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	int refs, cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(this_cpu) && irqs_disabled()
>  		     && !oops_in_progress && !early_boot_irqs_disabled);
>  
> -	/* So, what's a CPU they want? Ignoring this one. */
> +	/* Try to fastpath.  So, what's a CPU they want? Ignoring this one. */
>  	cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
>  	if (cpu == this_cpu)
>  		cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
> @@ -519,6 +519,13 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
>  	/* We rely on the "and" being processed before the store */
>  	cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
>  	cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, data->cpumask);
> +	refs = cpumask_weight(data->cpumask);
> +
> +	/* Some callers race with other cpus changing the passed mask */
> +	if (unlikely(!refs)) {
> +		csd_unlock(&data->csd);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function.lock, flags);
>  	/*
> @@ -532,7 +539,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
>  	 * to the cpumask before this write to refs, which indicates
>  	 * data is on the list and is ready to be processed.
>  	 */
> -	atomic_set(&data->refs, cpumask_weight(data->cpumask));
> +	atomic_set(&data->refs, refs);
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&call_function.lock, flags);
>  
>  	/*




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-16  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12  4:07 [PATCH] smp_call_function_many SMP race Anton Blanchard
2011-01-17 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 21:05   ` Milton Miller
2011-01-18 21:06     ` [PATCH 2/2] consolidate writes in smp_call_funtion_interrupt Milton Miller
2011-01-27 16:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 21:59         ` Milton Miller
2011-01-29  0:20           ` call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Milton Miller
2011-01-31  7:21             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-31 20:26               ` [PATCH] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask Milton Miller
2011-02-01  3:15                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-31 10:27             ` call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 20:26               ` Milton Miller
2011-01-31 20:39                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 21:17             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 21:36               ` Milton Miller
2011-02-01  0:22               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-01  1:39                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-01  2:18                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01  2:43                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-01  4:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01  5:46                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-01  6:18                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-01 14:13                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01  6:16                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found]             ` <ipi-list-reply@mdm.bga.com>
2011-02-01  7:12               ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Milton Miller
2011-02-01 22:00                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01 22:00                   ` Milton Miller
2011-02-02  4:17                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-06 23:51                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-15 19:27                         ` [PATCH 0/4 v3] smp_call_function_many issues from review Milton Miller
2011-03-15 20:22                           ` Luck, Tony
2011-03-15 20:32                             ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-03-15 20:39                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-16 17:55                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-16 18:13                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-17  3:15                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-07  8:12                       ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Mike Galbraith
2011-02-08 19:36                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-21  6:17                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-02  6:22                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-01  7:12               ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask Milton Miller
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 2/4 v3] call_function_many: add missing ordering Milton Miller
2011-03-16 12:06                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 1/4 v3] call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Milton Miller
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 3/4 v3] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask Milton Miller
2011-03-15 22:32                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-16  7:52                 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 4/4 v3] smp_call_function_interrupt: use typedef and %pf Milton Miller
2011-01-18 21:07     ` [PATCH 1/2] smp_call_function_many SMP race Milton Miller
2011-01-20  0:41       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D807A430200007800036BDF@vpn.id2.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®