mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com, mingo@elte.hu, jaxboe@fusionio.com,
	npiggin@gmail.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, miltonm@bga.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] smp_call_function_many SMP race
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:07:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <smp-call-function-simplified@mdm.bga.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <smp-call-function-peter-reply@mdm.bga.com>

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>

I noticed a failure where we hit the following WARN_ON in
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt:

                if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask))
                        continue;

                data->csd.func(data->csd.info);

                refs = atomic_dec_return(&data->refs);
                WARN_ON(refs < 0);      <-------------------------

We atomically tested and cleared our bit in the cpumask, and yet the
number of cpus left (ie refs) was 0. How can this be?

It turns out commit 54fdade1c3332391948ec43530c02c4794a38172
(generic-ipi: make struct call_function_data lockless)
is at fault. It removes locking from smp_call_function_many and in
doing so creates a rather complicated race.

The problem comes about because:

- The smp_call_function_many interrupt handler walks call_function.queue
  without any locking.
- We reuse a percpu data structure in smp_call_function_many.
- We do not wait for any RCU grace period before starting the next
  smp_call_function_many.

Imagine a scenario where CPU A does two smp_call_functions back to
back, and CPU B does an smp_call_function in between. We concentrate on
how CPU C handles the calls:


CPU A            CPU B                  CPU C              CPU D

smp_call_function
                                        smp_call_function_interrupt
                                            walks
					call_function.queue sees
					data from CPU A on list

                 smp_call_function

                                        smp_call_function_interrupt
                                            walks
							
                                        call_function.queue sees
                                          (stale) CPU A on list
							   smp_call_function int
							   clears last ref on A
							   list_del_rcu, unlock
smp_call_function reuses
percpu *data A
                                         data->cpumask sees and
                                         clears bit in cpumask
                                         might be using old or new fn!
                                         decrements refs below 0

set data->refs (too late!)


The important thing to note is since the interrupt handler walks a
potentially stale call_function.queue without any locking, then another
cpu can view the percpu *data structure at any time, even when the
owner is in the process of initialising it.

The following test case hits the WARN_ON 100% of the time on my PowerPC
box (having 128 threads does help :)


#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>

#define ITERATIONS 100

static void do_nothing_ipi(void *dummy)
{
}

static void do_ipis(struct work_struct *dummy)
{
	int i;

	for (i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++)
		smp_call_function(do_nothing_ipi, NULL, 1);

	printk(KERN_DEBUG "cpu %d finished\n", smp_processor_id());
}

static struct work_struct work[NR_CPUS];

static int __init testcase_init(void)
{
	int cpu;

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
		INIT_WORK(&work[cpu], do_ipis);
		schedule_work_on(cpu, &work[cpu]);
	}

	return 0;
}

static void __exit testcase_exit(void)
{
}

module_init(testcase_init)
module_exit(testcase_exit)
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Anton Blanchard");


I tried to fix it by ordering the read and the write of ->cpumask and
->refs. In doing so I missed a critical case but Paul McKenney was able
to spot my bug thankfully :) To ensure we arent viewing previous
iterations the interrupt handler needs to read ->refs then ->cpumask
then ->refs _again_.

Thanks to Milton Miller and Paul McKenney for helping to debug this
issue.

[Milton Miller: add WARN_ON and BUG_ON, remove extra read of refs before
initial read of mask that doesn't help (also noted by Peter Zijlstra),
adjust comments, hopefully clarify senerio ]

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Revised-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com> [ removed excess tests ]
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.32 and later

Index: common/kernel/smp.c
===================================================================
--- common.orig/kernel/smp.c	2011-01-17 20:15:54.000000000 -0600
+++ common/kernel/smp.c	2011-01-17 20:16:18.000000000 -0600
@@ -194,6 +194,24 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &call_function.queue, csd.list) {
 		int refs;
 
+		/*
+		 * Since we walk the list without any locks, we might
+		 * see an entry that was completed, removed from the
+		 * list and is in the process of being reused.
+		 *
+		 * We must check that the cpu is in the cpumask before
+		 * checking the refs, and both must be set before
+		 * executing the callback on this cpu.
+		 */
+
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask))
+			continue;
+
+		smp_rmb();
+
+		if (atomic_read(&data->refs) == 0)
+			continue;
+
 		if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask))
 			continue;
 
@@ -202,6 +220,8 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
 		refs = atomic_dec_return(&data->refs);
 		WARN_ON(refs < 0);
 		if (!refs) {
+			WARN_ON(!cpumask_empty(data->cpumask));
+
 			raw_spin_lock(&call_function.lock);
 			list_del_rcu(&data->csd.list);
 			raw_spin_unlock(&call_function.lock);
@@ -453,11 +473,21 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
 
 	data = &__get_cpu_var(cfd_data);
 	csd_lock(&data->csd);
+	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&data->refs) || !cpumask_empty(data->cpumask));
 
 	data->csd.func = func;
 	data->csd.info = info;
 	cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, data->cpumask);
+
+	/*
+	 * To ensure the interrupt handler gets an complete view
+	 * we order the cpumask and refs writes and order the read
+	 * of them in the interrupt handler.  In addition we may
+	 * only clear our own cpu bit from the mask.
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+
 	atomic_set(&data->refs, cpumask_weight(data->cpumask));
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function.lock, flags);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-18 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12  4:07 [PATCH] " Anton Blanchard
2011-01-17 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 21:05   ` Milton Miller
2011-01-18 21:06     ` [PATCH 2/2] consolidate writes in smp_call_funtion_interrupt Milton Miller
2011-01-27 16:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 21:59         ` Milton Miller
2011-01-29  0:20           ` call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Milton Miller
2011-01-31  7:21             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-31 20:26               ` [PATCH] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask Milton Miller
2011-02-01  3:15                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-31 10:27             ` call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 20:26               ` Milton Miller
2011-01-31 20:39                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 21:17             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 21:36               ` Milton Miller
2011-02-01  0:22               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-01  1:39                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-01  2:18                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01  2:43                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-01  4:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01  5:46                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-01  6:18                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-01 14:13                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01  6:16                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found]             ` <ipi-list-reply@mdm.bga.com>
2011-02-01  7:12               ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Milton Miller
2011-02-01 22:00                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-01 22:00                   ` Milton Miller
2011-02-02  4:17                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-06 23:51                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-15 19:27                         ` [PATCH 0/4 v3] smp_call_function_many issues from review Milton Miller
2011-03-15 20:22                           ` Luck, Tony
2011-03-15 20:32                             ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-03-15 20:39                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-16 17:55                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-16 18:13                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-17  3:15                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-07  8:12                       ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Mike Galbraith
2011-02-08 19:36                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-21  6:17                           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-02  6:22                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-01  7:12               ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask Milton Miller
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 2/4 v3] call_function_many: add missing ordering Milton Miller
2011-03-16 12:06                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 1/4 v3] call_function_many: fix list delete vs add race Milton Miller
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 4/4 v3] smp_call_function_interrupt: use typedef and %pf Milton Miller
2011-03-15 19:27               ` [PATCH 3/4 v3] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask Milton Miller
2011-03-15 22:32                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-16  7:52                 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-18 21:07     ` Milton Miller [this message]
2011-01-20  0:41       ` [PATCH 1/2] smp_call_function_many SMP race Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=smp-call-function-simplified@mdm.bga.com \
    --to=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome