From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
kernel@gpiccoli.net, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Joshua Ashton <joshua@froggi.es>,
Paul Gofman <pgofman@codeweavers.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
Pierre-Loup Griffais <pgriffais@valvesoftware.com>,
Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/split_lock: Restore warn mode (and add a new one) to avoid userspace regression
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:15:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4baa3654-9a1b-b60c-4a3c-55debe9e8044@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecbc58bc-a250-cf39-dea6-9b0b1c3e6503@intel.com>
Two responses in one:
First, I like Tony's idea - heuristic based on CPU number seems to make
sense. This number could be purely based on CPU number with a hardcoded
value, or based in a Kconfig (after N CPUs, add misery).
Now, second part below, inline:
On 29/09/2022 13:26, Dave Hansen wrote:
> [...]
> Let's be precise here, though. It isn't that folks can't play. It's
> that we *intentionally* put something in place that kept them from
> playing. They can play just fine after disabling split lock detection.
>
Agreed with your wording, would just maybe "s/put something/added a
policy" heheh
>> [...]
> They don't have to live with it. They can turn it off. That's why the
> command-line disable is there.
>
If they know how to do it, right? I'd rather have it as a new
non-default mechanism or at least, a Kconfig option in which gamer
distros could tune for their users, so we're not requiring them to tune
x86-specific parameters to play some game.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 14:21 Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-09-28 20:24 ` Luck, Tony
2022-09-28 20:50 ` Joshua Ashton
2022-09-28 20:56 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-10-06 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-10-06 20:58 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-10-06 9:04 ` Pavel Machek
2022-10-06 15:07 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-09-28 21:50 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-29 14:57 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-09-29 15:17 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-29 15:30 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-09-29 16:26 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-29 17:15 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli [this message]
2022-09-29 17:23 ` Paul Gofman
2022-09-29 15:37 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-30 16:13 ` Lukas Straub
2022-09-29 17:17 ` Zebediah Figura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4baa3654-9a1b-b60c-4a3c-55debe9e8044@igalia.com \
--to=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joshua@froggi.es \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel@gpiccoli.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mwen@igalia.com \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=pgofman@codeweavers.com \
--cc=pgriffais@valvesoftware.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®