From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nilay@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 3/7] blk-mq: add a new queue sysfs attribute async_depth
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:45:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f3ed928-2fef-469d-8bfc-76041267b1c6@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116035228.119987-4-yukuai@fnnas.com>
On 11/15/25 7:52 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> +static void blk_mq_limit_depth(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> +{
> + struct elevator_mq_ops *ops;
> +
> + /* If elevator is none, don't limit requests */
Nobody calls an I/O scheduler an elevator anymore. So I propose to
change "elevator is none" into "no I/O scheduler has been configured".
> + /*
> + * Flush/passthrough requests are special and go directly to the
> + * dispatch list, they don't have limit.
> + */
"they don't have a limit" -> "are not subject to the async_depth limit".
> + /*
> + * By default, sync requests have no limit, and async requests is
> + * limited to async_depth.
> + */
"is" -> "are"
> - /*
> - * All requests use scheduler tags when an I/O scheduler is
> - * enabled for the queue.
> - */
> - data->rq_flags |= RQF_SCHED_TAGS;
Why has the above comment been removed? I think that it is useful.
Additionally, please split this patch into two patches: a first patch
that introduces the function blk_mq_limit_depth() and a second patch
with the remaining changes from this patch.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 3:52 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/7] blk-mq: introduce new queue " Yu Kuai
2025-11-16 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 1/7] block: convert nr_requests to unsigned int Yu Kuai
2025-11-16 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 2/7] blk-mq-sched: unify elevators checking for async requests Yu Kuai
2025-11-17 23:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18 5:56 ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-16 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 3/7] blk-mq: add a new queue sysfs attribute async_depth Yu Kuai
2025-11-17 23:45 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-11-16 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 4/7] kyber: covert to use request_queue->async_depth Yu Kuai
2025-11-16 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 5/7] mq-deadline: " Yu Kuai
2025-11-16 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 6/7] block, bfq: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-11-16 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 7/7] blk-mq: add documentation for new queue attribute async_dpeth Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f3ed928-2fef-469d-8bfc-76041267b1c6@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®