Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] thermal OF rework

[Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>]

Hi Daniel,

On 7/25/22 17:34, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On 22/07/2022 21:59, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The thermal framework initialization with the device tree appears to
>> be complicated and hard to make it to evolve.
>>
>> It contains duplication of almost the same thermal generic structures
>> and has an assymetric initialization making hard any kind of serious
>> changes for more complex features. One of them is the multiple sensors
>> support per thermal zone.
>>
>> In order to set the scene for the aforementioned feature with generic
>> code, we need to cleanup and rework the device tree initialization.
>>
>> However this rework is not obvious because of the multiple components
>> entering in the composition of a thermal zone and being initialized at
>> different moments. For instance, a cooling device can be initialized
>> before a sensor, so the thermal zones must exist before the cooling
>> device as well as the sensor. This asynchronous initialization forces
>> the thermal zone to be created with fake ops because they are
>> mandotory and build a list of cooling devices which is used to lookup
>> afterwards when the cooling device driver is registering itself.
>>
>> As there could be a large number of changes, this first series provide
>> some steps forward for a simpler device tree initialization.
>>
>> More series for cleanup and code duplication removal will follow.
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>>   - v6:
>>      - Folded patches 8, 9, 10
>>      - Removed thermal_zone_get_trips() and thermal_zone_get_num_trips()
>>      - Moved tz->ntrips => tz->num_trips changes into patch 11 to fix the
>>        git bisecting
>>
> 
> I believe all the comments were addressed, is it fine if I merge this 
> series ?
> 
> 

My apologies for being quiet, I was on holiday last week.
Please don't wait for me, I'm still catching up with internal stuff.
Based on your changelog I can see you've addressed my comments.

Regards,
Lukasz