From: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com,
lixiaoyan@google.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com,
alexanderduyck@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] gro: decrease size of CB
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 17:46:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50181937-19ea-ccca-057c-eb6931f4b2da@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fdc1d609-5604-f372-6e64-1ea971fabe84@nvidia.com>
On 02/07/2023 17:41, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 30/06/2023 18:39, Richard Gobert wrote:
>> I haven't been able to reproduce it yet, I tried two different setups:
>> - 2 VMs running locally on my PC, and a geneve interface for each. Over
>> these geneve interfaces, I sent tcp traffic with a similar iperf
>> command as yours.
>> - A geneve tunnel over veth peers inside two separate namespaces as
>> David suggested.
>>
>> The throughput looked fine and identical with and without my patch in both
>> setups.
>>
>> Although I did validate it while working on the patch, a problem may arise
>> from:
>> - Packing CB members into a union, which could've led to some sort of
>> corruption.
>> - Calling `gro_pull_from_frag0` on the current skb before inserting it
>> into `gro_list`.
>>
>> Could I ask you to run some tests:
>> - Running the script I attached here on one machine and checking whether
>> it reproduces the problem.
>> - Reverting part of my commit:
>> - Reverting the change to CB struct while keeping the changes to
>> `gro_pull_from_frag0`.
>> - Checking whether the regression remains.
>>
>> Also, could you give me some more details:
>> - The VMs' NIC and driver. Are you using Qemu?
>> - iperf results.
>> - The exact kernel versions (commit hashes) you are using.
>> - Did you run the commands (sysctl/ethtool) on the receiving VM?
>>
>>
>> Here are the commands I used for the namespaces test's setup:
>> ```
>> ip netns add ns1
>>
>> ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
>> ip link set veth1 netns ns1
>>
>> ip a add 192.168.1.1/32 dev veth0
>> ip link set veth0 up
>> ip r add 192.168.1.0/24 dev veth0
>>
>> ip netns exec ns1 ip a add 192.168.1.2/32 dev veth1
>> ip netns exec ns1 ip link set veth1 up
>> ip netns exec ns1 ip r add 192.168.1.0/24 dev veth1
>>
>> ip link add name gnv0 type geneve id 1000 remote 192.168.1.2
>> ip a add 10.0.0.1/32 dev gnv0
>> ip link set gnv0 up
>> ip r add 10.0.1.1/32 dev gnv0
>>
>> ip netns exec ns1 ip link add name gnv0 type geneve id 1000 remote 192.168.1.1
>> ip netns exec ns1 ip a add 10.0.1.1/32 dev gnv0
>> ip netns exec ns1 ip link set gnv0 up
>> ip netns exec ns1 ip r add 10.0.0.1/32 dev gnv0
>>
>> ethtool -K veth0 generic-receive-offload off
>> ip netns exec ns1 ethtool -K veth1 generic-receive-offload off
>>
>> # quick way to enable gro on veth devices
>> ethtool -K veth0 tcp-segmentation-offload off
>> ip netns exec ns1 ethtool -K veth1 tcp-segmentation-offload off
>> ```
>>
>> I'll continue looking into it on Monday. It would be great if someone from
>> your team can write a test that reproduces this issue.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Hey,
>
> I don't have an answer for all of your questions yet, but it turns out I
> left out an important detail, the issue reproduces when outer ipv6 is used.
>
> I'm using ConnectX-6 Dx, with these scripts:
>
> Server:
> ip addr add 194.236.5.246/16 dev eth2
> ip addr add ::12:236:5:246/96 dev eth2
> ip link set dev eth2 up
>
> ip link add p1_g464 type geneve id 464 remote ::12:236:4:245
> ip link set dev p1_g464 up
> ip addr add 196.236.5.1/16 dev p1_g464
>
> Client:
> ip addr add 194.236.4.245/16 dev eth2
> ip addr add ::12:236:4:245/96 dev eth2
> ip link set dev eth2 up
>
> ip link add p0_g464 type geneve id 464 remote ::12:236:5:246
> ip link set dev p0_g464 up
> ip addr add 196.236.4.2/16 dev p0_g464
>
> Once everything is set up, iperf -s on the server and
> iperf -c 196.236.5.1 -i1 -t1000
> On the client, should do the work.
>
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to reproduce the same issue with veth
> interfaces.
>
> Reverting the napi_gro_cb part indeed resolves the issue.
>
> Thanks for taking a look!
BTW, all testing is done after checking out to your commit:
7b355b76e2b3 ("gro: decrease size of CB")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-02 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 16:09 [PATCH v3 0/1] " Richard Gobert
2023-06-01 16:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Richard Gobert
2023-06-06 7:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-06-26 8:55 ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-27 14:21 ` David Ahern
2023-06-28 12:42 ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-28 14:19 ` David Ahern
2023-08-23 14:43 ` Gal Pressman
2023-08-24 3:31 ` David Ahern
2023-06-29 12:36 ` Richard Gobert
2023-06-29 13:04 ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-30 15:39 ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-02 14:41 ` Gal Pressman
2023-07-02 14:46 ` Gal Pressman [this message]
2023-07-03 14:23 ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-07 12:31 ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-09 6:55 ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-02 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-05 13:58 ` Richard Gobert
2023-06-06 13:24 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-06 9:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50181937-19ea-ccca-057c-eb6931f4b2da@nvidia.com \
--to=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome