mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com,
	lixiaoyan@google.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com,
	alexanderduyck@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] gro: decrease size of CB
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 17:41:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdc1d609-5604-f372-6e64-1ea971fabe84@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230630153923.GA18237@debian>

On 30/06/2023 18:39, Richard Gobert wrote:
> I haven't been able to reproduce it yet, I tried two different setups:
>     - 2 VMs running locally on my PC, and a geneve interface for each. Over
>       these geneve interfaces, I sent tcp traffic with a similar iperf
>       command as yours.
>     - A geneve tunnel over veth peers inside two separate namespaces as
>       David suggested.
> 
> The throughput looked fine and identical with and without my patch in both
> setups.
> 
> Although I did validate it while working on the patch, a problem may arise
> from:
>     - Packing CB members into a union, which could've led to some sort of
>       corruption.
>     - Calling `gro_pull_from_frag0` on the current skb before inserting it
>       into `gro_list`.
> 
> Could I ask you to run some tests:
>     - Running the script I attached here on one machine and checking whether
>       it reproduces the problem. 
>     - Reverting part of my commit: 
>         - Reverting the change to CB struct while keeping the changes to
>           `gro_pull_from_frag0`.
>         - Checking whether the regression remains.
> 
> Also, could you give me some more details:
>     - The VMs' NIC and driver. Are you using Qemu? 
>     - iperf results.
>     - The exact kernel versions (commit hashes) you are using.
>     - Did you run the commands (sysctl/ethtool) on the receiving VM?
> 
> 
> Here are the commands I used for the namespaces test's setup:
> ```
> ip netns add ns1
> 
> ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
> ip link set veth1 netns ns1
> 
> ip a add 192.168.1.1/32 dev veth0
> ip link set veth0 up
> ip r add 192.168.1.0/24 dev veth0
> 
> ip netns exec ns1 ip a add 192.168.1.2/32 dev veth1
> ip netns exec ns1 ip link set veth1 up
> ip netns exec ns1 ip r add 192.168.1.0/24 dev veth1
> 
> ip link add name gnv0 type geneve id 1000 remote 192.168.1.2
> ip a add 10.0.0.1/32 dev gnv0
> ip link set gnv0 up
> ip r add 10.0.1.1/32 dev gnv0
> 
> ip netns exec ns1 ip link add name gnv0 type geneve id 1000 remote 192.168.1.1
> ip netns exec ns1 ip a add 10.0.1.1/32 dev gnv0
> ip netns exec ns1 ip link set gnv0 up
> ip netns exec ns1 ip r add 10.0.0.1/32 dev gnv0
> 
> ethtool -K veth0 generic-receive-offload off
> ip netns exec ns1 ethtool -K veth1 generic-receive-offload off
> 
> # quick way to enable gro on veth devices
> ethtool -K veth0 tcp-segmentation-offload off
> ip netns exec ns1 ethtool -K veth1 tcp-segmentation-offload off
> ```
> 
> I'll continue looking into it on Monday. It would be great if someone from
> your team can write a test that reproduces this issue.
> 
> Thanks.

Hey,

I don't have an answer for all of your questions yet, but it turns out I
left out an important detail, the issue reproduces when outer ipv6 is used.

I'm using ConnectX-6 Dx, with these scripts:

Server:
ip addr add 194.236.5.246/16 dev eth2
ip addr add ::12:236:5:246/96 dev eth2
ip link set dev eth2 up

ip link add p1_g464 type geneve id 464 remote ::12:236:4:245
ip link set dev p1_g464 up
ip addr add 196.236.5.1/16 dev p1_g464

Client:
ip addr add 194.236.4.245/16 dev eth2
ip addr add ::12:236:4:245/96 dev eth2
ip link set dev eth2 up

ip link add p0_g464 type geneve id 464 remote ::12:236:5:246
ip link set dev p0_g464 up
ip addr add 196.236.4.2/16 dev p0_g464

Once everything is set up, iperf -s on the server and
iperf -c 196.236.5.1 -i1 -t1000
On the client, should do the work.

Unfortunately, I haven't been able to reproduce the same issue with veth
interfaces.

Reverting the napi_gro_cb part indeed resolves the issue.

Thanks for taking a look!

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-02 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01 16:09 [PATCH v3 0/1] " Richard Gobert
2023-06-01 16:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Richard Gobert
2023-06-06  7:25   ` Eric Dumazet
2023-06-26  8:55   ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-27 14:21     ` David Ahern
2023-06-28 12:42       ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-28 14:19         ` David Ahern
2023-08-23 14:43           ` Gal Pressman
2023-08-24  3:31             ` David Ahern
2023-06-29 12:36     ` Richard Gobert
2023-06-29 13:04       ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-30 15:39         ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-02 14:41           ` Gal Pressman [this message]
2023-07-02 14:46             ` Gal Pressman
2023-07-03 14:23               ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-07 12:31                 ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-09  6:55                   ` Gal Pressman
2023-06-02 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-05 13:58   ` Richard Gobert
2023-06-06 13:24     ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-06  9:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fdc1d609-5604-f372-6e64-1ea971fabe84@nvidia.com \
    --to=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®