From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Linhua Xu <Linhua.xu@unisoc.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
lh xu <xulh0829@gmail.com>, Zhirong Qiu <zhirong.qiu@unisoc.com>,
Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@unisoc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] pinctrl: sprd: Fix the incorrect mask and shift definition
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:28:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50b7293c-8c4d-0162-2810-a74d59e7d03e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230908055146.18347-3-Linhua.xu@unisoc.com>
On 9/8/2023 1:51 PM, Linhua Xu wrote:
> From: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>
>
> Pull-up and pull-down are mutually exclusive. When setting one of them,
> the bit of the other needs to be clear. Now, there are cases where pull-up
> and pull-down are set at the same time in the code, thus fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
> index 25fb9ce9ad78..5b9126b2cde2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
> @@ -58,21 +58,21 @@
> #define DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT 19
>
> #define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN BIT(2)
> -#define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN_MASK 0x1
> +#define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> #define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN_SHIFT 2
>
> #define PULL_DOWN BIT(6)
> -#define PULL_DOWN_MASK 0x1
> +#define PULL_DOWN_MASK (GENMASK(1, 0) | BIT(6))
> #define PULL_DOWN_SHIFT 6
>
> #define SLEEP_PULL_UP BIT(3)
> -#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_MASK 0x1
> -#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_SHIFT 3
> +#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_SHIFT 2
>
> #define PULL_UP_4_7K (BIT(12) | BIT(7))
> #define PULL_UP_20K BIT(7)
> -#define PULL_UP_MASK 0x21
> -#define PULL_UP_SHIFT 7
> +#define PULL_UP_MASK (GENMASK(1, 0) | BIT(6))
> +#define PULL_UP_SHIFT 6
This change looks weird, BIT(6) is for PULL_DOWN. So I am curious these
changes are backward compatibility?
Now I can not access the SPRD Spec, Chunyan, can you help to confirm
these changes? Thanks.
>
> #define INPUT_SCHMITT BIT(11)
> #define INPUT_SCHMITT_MASK 0x1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-08 5:51 [PATCH V2 0/6] pinctrl: sprd: Modification of UNIOC Platform pinctrl Driver Linhua Xu
2023-09-08 5:51 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] pinctrl: sprd: Modify the probe function parameters Linhua Xu
2023-09-11 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-12 8:13 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-08 5:51 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] pinctrl: sprd: Fix the incorrect mask and shift definition Linhua Xu
2023-09-11 9:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-12 8:28 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-11-13 13:50 ` Linus Walleij
2023-09-08 5:51 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] pinctrl: sprd: Modify pull-up parameters Linhua Xu
2023-09-11 9:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-12 8:22 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-08 5:51 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] pinctrl: sprd: Add pinctrl support for UMS512 Linhua Xu
2023-09-09 1:56 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-11 9:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-08 5:51 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] pinctrl: sprd: Increase the range of register values Linhua Xu
2023-09-11 9:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-12 8:37 ` Baolin Wang
[not found] ` <CAPjKKSrs9X2msnDg=9rC8H57Dq8FPd7SWyBsr2MCwL0FMNkHPA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-10-26 2:57 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-08 5:51 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] pinctrl: sprd: Add pinctrl support for UMS9621 Linhua Xu
2023-09-11 9:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-11 13:41 ` [PATCH V2 0/6] pinctrl: sprd: Modification of UNIOC Platform pinctrl Driver Linus Walleij
2023-09-12 8:40 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50b7293c-8c4d-0162-2810-a74d59e7d03e@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Linhua.xu@unisoc.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=xiongpeng.wu@unisoc.com \
--cc=xulh0829@gmail.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
--cc=zhirong.qiu@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®