mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hpa@zytor.com
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Chang Seok Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Disallow RDPID in paranoid entry if KVM is enabled
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:55:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5120CF63-12EB-4701-B303-C0A96201F5A2@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1s0gxfj.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On August 21, 2020 2:28:32 AM PDT, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 21 2020 at 10:09, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 21/08/20 09:47, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 07:50:50PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>> +	 * Disallow RDPID if KVM is enabled as it may consume a guest's
>TSC_AUX
>>>> +	 * if an NMI arrives in KVM's run loop.  KVM loads guest's
>TSC_AUX on
>>>> +	 * VM-Enter and may not restore the host's value until the CPU
>returns
>>>> +	 * to userspace, i.e. KVM depends on the kernel not using
>TSC_AUX.
>>>>  	 */
>>> And frankly, this is really unfair. The kernel should be able to use
>any
>>> MSR. IOW, KVM needs to be fixed here. I'm sure it context-switches
>other
>>> MSRs so one more MSR is not a big deal.
>>
>> The only MSR that KVM needs to context-switch manually are XSS and
>> SPEC_CTRL.  They tend to be the same on host and guest in which case
>> they can be optimized away.
>>
>> All the other MSRs (EFER and PAT are those that come to mind) are
>> handled by the microcode and thus they don't have the slowness of
>> RDMSR/WRMSR
>>
>> One more MSR *is* a big deal: KVM's vmentry+vmexit cost is around
>1000
>> cycles, adding 100 clock cycles for 2 WRMSRs is a 10% increase.
>
>We all know that MSRs are slow, but as a general rule I have to make it
>entirely clear that the kernel has precedence over KVM.
>
>If the kernel wants to use an MSR for it's own purposes then KVM has to
>deal with that and not the other way round. Preventing the kernel from
>using a facility freely is not an option ever.
>
>The insanities of KVM performance optimizations have bitten us more
>than
>once.
>
>For this particular case at hand I don't care much and we should just
>rip the whole RDPID thing out unconditionally. We still have zero
>numbers about the performance difference vs. LSL.
>
>Thanks,
>
>        tglx

It is hardly going to be a performance difference for paranoid entry, which is hopefully rare enough that it falls into the noise.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-21 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-21  2:50 Sean Christopherson
2020-08-21  7:24 ` peterz
2020-08-21  7:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-21  7:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-21  8:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-21  8:16     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-21  9:05       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-21  9:22         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-21  9:44           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-21  9:48             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-21 10:07               ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-22 16:42                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-16 16:54                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-21  9:28     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-21  9:37       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-21 19:55       ` hpa [this message]
2020-08-21 20:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:56 ` kernel test robot
2020-08-21 10:28 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5120CF63-12EB-4701-B303-C0A96201F5A2@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®