Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Change HCI marco to actual bit position

[Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>]

Hi Bart,

On 10/02/2017 10:11 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 11:52 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Currently UFS HCI uses UFS_BIT() macro to get various bit
>> position for the hardware registers status bits. Which makes
>> code longer instead of shorter. This macro does not improve
>> code readability as well.
>> Lets re-write these macro definition with the actual bit position.
> 
> Can the three patches in this series be combined into a single patch?
> 
Since UFS_BIT() used in qcom-ufs driver as well, so I thought of keeping 
them in separate patches. This way "git bisect" will work all the time.

>> -#define UFS_BIT(x)	(1L << (x))
>> [ ... ]
>> +#define UFS_BIT(x)     (1L << (x))
> 
> If you want to keep the three patches separate, please make sure that this
> patch does not modify the UFS_BIT() definition. Please also fix the spelling
> of the title of this patch (marco -> macro).
> 
Ok, will fix these
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
>