mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: About [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Provide a dummy regulator with full constraints
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:39:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525F6A1B.70505@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131016103942.GG2443@sirena.org.uk>

On 10/16/2013 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> 
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:36:46PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> On 10/12/2013 08:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> OK, I think the device tree board code just needs to set full
>>> constraints during machine initialisation.  We can't have multiple
> 
>> Hi, Mark, do you mean we can call regulator_has_full_constraints(), but
>> some platforms doesn't have board file now, they only have dts file, how
>> to call this functions?
> 
> There is still a board file for DT machines, it's just shared between
> all machines - it should be doing the call instead of the regulator
> framework trying to retrofit it.

So do you mean it should call the regulator_has_full_constraints() in
the .init_machine for all machines? If so, this will affect all boards,
for example, in arch/arm/mach-tegra, if we set full constraints in the
shared board file tegra.c, all tegra boards will be set, is it right?

Thanks.
Wei.

> 
> * Unknown Key
> * 0x7EA229BD
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-17  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-08  6:09 Wei Ni
2013-10-08  9:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-08  9:46   ` Wei Ni
2013-10-12 12:14     ` Mark Brown
2013-10-16  4:36       ` Wei Ni
2013-10-16 10:39         ` Mark Brown
2013-10-17  4:39           ` Wei Ni [this message]
2013-10-17  9:37             ` Mark Brown
2013-10-17 10:39               ` Wei Ni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525F6A1B.70505@nvidia.com \
    --to=wni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome