From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 23:43:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B6FA62.8010401@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrV275oYQY80yg6TJ-h9n2Db-uF-po90bF+JmKjnV5ZqYw@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/27/2015 11:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
>> <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/27/2015 11:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
>>>> <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 07/25/2015 01:36 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>>>> Here's v3. It fixes the "dazed and confused" issue, I hope. It's also
>>>>>> probably a good general attack surface reduction, and it replaces some
>>>>>> scary code with IMO less scary code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, servers and embedded systems should probably turn off modify_ldt.
>>>>>> This makes that possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Xen people, can you take a look at this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Willy and Kees: I left the config option alone. The -tiny people will
>>>>>> like it, and we can always add a sysctl of some sort later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes from v3:
>>>>>> - Hopefully fixed Xen.
>>>>>
>>>>> 32b-on-32b fails in the same manner. (but non-zero LDT is taken care of)
>>>>>
>>>>>> - Fixed 32-bit test case on 32-bit native kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure I see what changed.
>>>> I misplaced the fix in the wrong git commit, so I failed to sent it.
>>>> Oops.
>>>>
>>>> I just sent v4.1 of patch 3. Can you try that?
>>>
>>>
>>> I am hitting BUG() in Xen code (returning from a hypercall) when freeing LDT
>>> in destroy_context(). Interestingly though when I run the test in the
>>> debugger I get SIGILL (just like before) but no BUG().
>>>
>>> Let me get back to you on that later today.
>>>
>>>
>> After forward-porting my virtio patches, I got this thing to run on
>> Xen. After several tries, I got:
>>
>> [ 53.985707] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 53.986314] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:496!
>> [ 53.986677] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> [ 53.986677] Modules linked in:
>> [ 53.986677] CPU: 0 PID: 1400 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.2.0-rc4+ #4
>> [ 53.986677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
>> BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org
>> 04/01/2014
>> [ 53.986677] task: c2376180 ti: c0874000 task.ti: c0874000
>> [ 53.986677] EIP: 0061:[<c10530f2>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 0
>> [ 53.986677] EIP is at set_aliased_prot+0xb2/0xc0
>> [ 53.986677] EAX: ffffffea EBX: cc3d1000 ECX: 0672e063 EDX: 80000000
>> [ 53.986677] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 80000000 EBP: c0875e94 ESP: c0875e74
>> [ 53.986677] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069
>> [ 53.986677] CR0: 80050033 CR2: b77404d4 CR3: 020b6000 CR4: 00042660
>> [ 53.986677] Stack:
>> [ 53.986677] 80000000 0672e063 000021c0 cc3d1000 00000001 cc3d2000
>> 00000b4a 00000200
>> [ 53.986677] c0875ea8 c105312d c2317940 c2373a80 00000000 c0875eb4
>> c1062310 c01861c0
>> [ 53.986677] c0875ec0 c1062735 c01861c0 c0875ed4 c10a764e c7007a00
>> c2373a80 00000000
>> [ 53.986677] Call Trace:
>> [ 53.986677] [<c105312d>] xen_free_ldt+0x2d/0x40
>> [ 53.986677] [<c1062310>] free_ldt_struct.part.1+0x10/0x40
>> [ 53.986677] [<c1062735>] destroy_context+0x25/0x40
>> [ 53.986677] [<c10a764e>] __mmdrop+0x1e/0xc0
>> [ 53.986677] [<c10c9858>] finish_task_switch+0xd8/0x1a0
>> [ 53.986677] [<c1863736>] __schedule+0x316/0x950
>> [ 53.986677] [<c1863d96>] schedule+0x26/0x70
>> [ 53.986677] [<c10ac613>] do_wait+0x1b3/0x200
>> [ 53.986677] [<c10ac9d7>] SyS_waitpid+0x67/0xd0
>> [ 53.986677] [<c10aa820>] ? task_stopped_code+0x50/0x50
>> [ 53.986677] [<c186717a>] syscall_call+0x7/0x7
>> [ 53.986677] Code: e8 c1 e3 0c 81 eb 00 00 00 40 39 5d ec 74 11 8b
>> 4d e4 8b 55 e0 31 f6 e8 dd e0 fa ff 85 c0 75 0d 83 c4 14 5b 5e 5f 5d
>> c3 90 0f 0b <0f> 0b 0f 0b 8d 76 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 85 d2 74 31 55
>> 89 e5
>> [ 53.986677] EIP: [<c10530f2>] set_aliased_prot+0xb2/0xc0 SS:ESP 0069:c0875e74
>> [ 54.010069] ---[ end trace 89ac35b29c1c59bb ]---
>>
>> Is that the error you're seeing?
>>
>> If I change xen_free_ldt to:
>>
>> static void xen_free_ldt(struct desc_struct *ldt, unsigned entries)
>> {
>> const unsigned entries_per_page = PAGE_SIZE / LDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> int i;
>>
>> vm_unmap_aliases();
>> xen_mc_flush();
>>
>> for(i = 0; i < entries; i += entries_per_page)
>> set_aliased_prot(ldt + i, PAGE_KERNEL);
>> }
>>
>> then it works. I don't know why this makes a difference.
>> (xen_mc_flush makes a little bit of sense to me. vm_unmap_aliases
>> doesn't.)
>>
> That fix makes sense if there's some way that the vmalloc area we're
> freeing has an extra alias somewhere, which is very much possible. On
> the other hand, I don't see how this happens without first doing an
> MMUEXT_SET_LDT with an unexpectedly aliased address, and I would have
> expected that to blow up and/or result in test case failures.
>
> But I'm still confused, because it seems like Xen will never populate
> the actual (hidden) LDT mapping unless the pages backing it are
> unaliased and well-formed, which make me wonder why this stuff ever
> worked. Wouldn't LDT access with pre-existing vmalloc aliases result
> in segfaults?
>
> The semantics seem to be very odd. xen_free_ldt with an aliased
> address might fail (and OOPS), but actual access to the LDT with an
> aliased address page faults.
>
> Also, using kzalloc for everything fixes the problem, which suggests
> that there really is something to my theory that the problem involves
> unexpected aliases.
Yes, this is as far as I got as well (I didn't try unaliasing but now
that you found it -- it does indeed work). I am not sure whether you are
saying this (I think you do, implicitly, since you are replacing vzalloc
with kzalloc), but the problem only happens when we have multi-page LDT.
And it is reproducible with a single CPU.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-28 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-25 5:36 Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 5:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 9:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 5:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt optional Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 6:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 6:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 7:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/3] x86/ldt: allow to disable modify_ldt at runtime Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 16:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 16:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 17:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 18:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-27 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2015-07-27 21:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 9:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt optional Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 16:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 16:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 5:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] selftests/x86, x86/ldt: Add a selftest for modify_ldt Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-27 15:52 ` [PATCH v4.1 3.3] " Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 6:27 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option Willy Tarreau
2015-07-27 15:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-27 15:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-27 16:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 2:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 3:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 3:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 3:43 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2015-07-28 10:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 14:05 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 14:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 14:50 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 15:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-07-28 15:39 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 15:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 15:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 15:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 16:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 17:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 17:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 0:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 0:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 3:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 4:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 5:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 14:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 14:43 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 19:03 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 21:23 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 21:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 21:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 21:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 22:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 22:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 22:40 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 22:46 ` David Vrabel
2015-07-29 22:49 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 22:55 ` David Vrabel
2015-07-29 23:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 23:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-30 0:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-30 18:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-30 18:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-30 20:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-30 20:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-30 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B6FA62.8010401@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome