From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:43:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B8E68B.2030305@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B8E16C.2050406@citrix.com>
On 07/29/2015 10:21 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/07/15 06:28, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
>> <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2015 08:47 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> On 29/07/2015 01:21, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
>>>>> <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Cooper
>>>>>>> <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I suspect that the set_ldt(NULL, 0) call hasn't reached Xen before
>>>>>>>> xen_free_ldt() is attempting to nab back the pages which Xen still has
>>>>>>>> mapped as an LDT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just instrumented it with yet more LSL instructions. I'm pretty
>>>>>>> sure that set_ldt really is clearing at least LDT entry zero.
>>>>>>> Nonetheless the free_ldt call still oopses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I added some instrumentation to the hypervisor and we definitely
>>>>>> set
>>>>>> LDT to NULL before failing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -boris
>>>>> Looking at map_ldt_shadow_page: what keeps shadow_ldt_mapcnt from
>>>>> getting incremented once on each CPU at the same time if both CPUs
>>>>> fault in the same shadow LDT page at the same time?
>>>> Nothing, but that is fine. If a page is in use in two vcpus LDTs, it is
>>>> expected to have a type refcount of 2.
>>>>
>>>>> Similarly, what
>>>>> keeps both CPUs from calling get_page_type at the same time and
>>>>> therefore losing track of the page type reference count?
>>>> a cmpxchg() loop in the depths of __get_page_type().
>>>>
>>>>> I don't see why vmalloc or vm_unmap_aliases would have anything to do
>>>>> with this, though.
>>> So just for kicks I made lazy_max_pages() return 0 to free vmaps immediately
>>> and the problem went away.
>> As far as I can tell, this affects TLB flushes but not unmaps. That
>> means that my patch is totally bogus -- vm_unmap_aliases() *flushed*
>> aliases but isn't involved in removing them from the page tables.
>> That must be why xen_alloc_ldt and xen_set_ldt work today.
>>
>> So what does flushing the TLB have to do with anything? The only
>> thing I can think of is that it might force some deferred hypercalls
>> out. I can reproduce this easily on UP, so IPIs aren't involved.
>>
>> The other odd thing is that it seems like this happens when clearing
>> the LDT and freeing the old one but not when setting the LDT and
>> freeing the old one. This is plausibly related to the lazy mode in
>> effect at the time, but I have no evidence for that.
>>
>> Two more data points: Putting xen_flush_mc before and after the
>> SET_LDT multicall has no effect. Putting flush_tlb_all() in
>> xen_free_ldt doesn't help either, while vm_unmap_aliases() in the
>> exact same place does help.
> FYI, I have got a repro now and am investigating.
To simplify your test case, this is sufficient for me to trigger this:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <asm/ldt.h>
int main()
{
int i;
struct user_desc desc = {
.entry_number = 0,
.base_addr = 0,
.limit = 10,
.seg_32bit = 1,
.contents = 2, /* Code, not conforming */
.read_exec_only = 0,
.limit_in_pages = 0,
.seg_not_present = 0,
.useable = 0
};
for (i = 0; i < 500; i++)
syscall(SYS_modify_ldt, 0x11, &desc, sizeof(desc));
}
Run this program in a loop --- the error is triggered (again, for me),
when it exits.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-29 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-25 5:36 Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 5:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 9:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 5:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt optional Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 6:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 6:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 7:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/3] x86/ldt: allow to disable modify_ldt at runtime Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 16:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 16:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 17:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 18:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-27 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2015-07-27 21:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 9:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt optional Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 16:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 16:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-25 5:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] selftests/x86, x86/ldt: Add a selftest for modify_ldt Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-27 15:52 ` [PATCH v4.1 3.3] " Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 6:27 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option Willy Tarreau
2015-07-27 15:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-27 15:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-27 16:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 2:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 3:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 3:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 3:43 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 10:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 14:05 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 14:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 14:50 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 15:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-07-28 15:39 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 15:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 15:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-28 15:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 16:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28 17:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 17:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 0:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 0:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 3:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 4:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 5:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 14:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 14:43 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2015-07-29 19:03 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 21:23 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 21:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 21:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 21:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 22:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29 22:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 22:40 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 22:46 ` David Vrabel
2015-07-29 22:49 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-29 22:55 ` David Vrabel
2015-07-29 23:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-29 23:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-30 0:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-30 18:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-30 18:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-30 20:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-30 20:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-30 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B8E68B.2030305@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome