From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.au@gmail.com>, Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Cc: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>,
claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: ravb: Do not apply RX checksum settings to hardware if the interface is down
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:40:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5600b643-0d07-5583-4858-a521676476a5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADT+UeAfCTd8c+dHn3mgT=g6Boip=oRPdkODMN_j2KaROcT0AQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/11/24 11:56 AM, Biju Das wrote:
>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>>>
>>>> Do not apply the RX checksum settings to hardware if the interface is
>>>> down.
>>>> In case runtime PM is enabled, and while the interface is down, the IP
>>>> will be in reset mode (as for some platforms disabling the clocks will
>>>> switch the IP to reset mode, which will lead to losing register
>>>> contents) and applying settings in reset mode is not an option.
>>>> Instead, cache the RX checksum settings and apply them in ravb_open()
>>>> through ravb_emac_init().
>>>> This has been solved by introducing pm_runtime_active() check. The
>>>> device runtime PM usage counter has been incremented to avoid
>>>> disabling the device clocks while the check is in progress (if any).
>>>>
>>>> Commit prepares for the addition of runtime PM.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
>>
>> This will do the same job, without code duplication right?
>>
>>> static int ravb_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
>>> netdev_features_t features)
>>> {
>>> struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>>> struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
>>> const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;
>>>
>>> pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
>>> if (!pm_runtime_active(dev)) {
>>> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
>>> ndev->features = features;
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return info->set_feature(ndev, features);
>
>> We now leak the device reference by not calling pm_runtime_put_noidle()
>> after this statement...
>
> Oops. So this leak can be fixed like [1]
>
>> The approach seems sane though -- Claudiu, please consider following it.
>
> [1]
> static int ravb_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
> netdev_features_t features)
> {
> struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;
> struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
> bool pm_active;
>
> pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
> pm_active = pm_runtime_active(dev);
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
There is no point dropping the RPM reference before we access
the regs...
> if (pm_active )
> return info->set_feature(ndev, features);
As I said, we should call pm_runtime_put_noidle() here...
> ndev->features = features;
> return 0;
> }
MBR, Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-11 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-11 8:56 Biju Das
2024-02-11 9:40 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2024-02-11 12:13 ` Biju Das
2024-02-11 12:29 ` Biju Das
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-09 17:04 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net: ravb: Add runtime PM support (part 2) Claudiu
2024-02-09 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: ravb: Do not apply RX checksum settings to hardware if the interface is down Claudiu
2024-02-09 17:11 ` Biju Das
2024-02-09 20:27 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-09 20:41 ` Biju Das
2024-02-10 20:37 ` Sergey Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5600b643-0d07-5583-4858-a521676476a5@gmail.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.au@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®